首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Health Co-Benefits and Impacts of Transitioning from Fossil-Fuel Based to Cleaner Energy Sources in Higher-Income Countries: What Do We Know?
【24h】

Health Co-Benefits and Impacts of Transitioning from Fossil-Fuel Based to Cleaner Energy Sources in Higher-Income Countries: What Do We Know?

机译:在高收入国家的清洁能源基于清洁能源的化石燃料过渡的卫生共享和影响:我们知道什么?

获取原文

摘要

Background: It is hypothesised that transitioning from traditional fossil fuel use to cleaner energy sources will have significant environmental benefits and health co-benefits related to reduced air pollution. However, little is understood with regard to potential adverse health impacts of new energy forms. Aim: To systematically synthesise current research that examined shifts to cleaner energy sources with specific consideration of health co-benefits. Method: Systematic search of PubMed, Medline and EMBASE databases and hand-searching for peer-reviewed studies published in English to 24 January 2018. Inclusion criteria: energy use or energy transition related to health outcomes or co-benefits; epidemiological, health impact assessment, modelling or hypothesised. Results: Of 5031 articles found, 58 original research and 14 review papers were considered. Few papers explicitly considered health benefits of energy transitions other than climate change scenarios. Papers were in key areas: biofuels; photovoltaic (PV) cells (solar panels); wind turbines; electrification of vehicles; modelling climate change policies; increased or decreased energy consumption and improved air quality; econometric modelling; and improved residential energy efficiency. Key findings were 1) biofuels, electric cars, PV cells and wind turbines may produce lower levels of air pollutants but there may be health risks associated with their production, use or disposal that needs to be incorporated in the overall assessment of health effects; and 2) environmental justice issues arise when an inequitable health burden is placed on poorer communities living near sites of electricity production while wealthier sectors benefit from newer technologies which are currently expensive e.g. electric vehicles. Conclusion: The degree of health benefit varies with the energy technology type. There is a need for targeted health impact assessments that incorporate life cycle assessment of newer energy technologies.
机译:背景:假设从传统化石燃料使用到清洁能源的过渡将具有显着的环境效益和与减少空气污染相关的健康共享。然而,关于新能源形式的潜在不利健康影响,很少理解。目的:系统地综合目前的研究,以了解对清洁能源的转变,具体考虑健康共同效益。方法:系统搜索PubMed,Medline和文摘数据库和手工检索了以英文发表于1月24日2018年入选标准同行评审的研究:能源使用或与之相关的健康结果或共同利益的能源过渡;流行病学,健康影响评估,建模或假设。结果:5031篇文章发现,58篇原创研究和14篇审查文件。少数论文明确地考虑了除了气候变化情景外的能源转型的健康益处。论文在关键领域:生物燃料;光伏(PV)电池(太阳能电池板);风力发电机;车辆的电气化;建模气候变化政策;增加或减少能耗和提高空气质量;计量计量型;改善住宅能源效率。主要发现是1)生物燃料,电动汽车,光伏电池和风力涡轮机可以产生较低的空气污染物,但可能与其生产,使用或处置有关的健康风险,需要纳入健康效应的整体评估中; 2)当较为昂贵的部门居住在电力生产附近的较差的社区时,出现环境司法问题,而较富裕的部门受益于目前昂贵的较贵技术。电动车。结论:健康效益程度随能源技术类型而变化。需要有针对性的健康影响评估,该评估包含新能源技术的生命周期评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号