首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting >COMPARING TWO KINEMATICS METHODS FOR TELEROBOTIC CONTROL APPLICATIONS
【24h】

COMPARING TWO KINEMATICS METHODS FOR TELEROBOTIC CONTROL APPLICATIONS

机译:比较两种动态控制应用方法

获取原文

摘要

Two inverse kinematics algorithms were implemented in a tele-operated robot system and evaluated with a user performance study. The kinematics algorithms were designed such that the point of resolution (POR) of the robot arm's wrist and the end-effector was controlled by joysticks, one each for rotation and translation. Operator performance was evaluated with "peg-in-the-hole" type tasks using both the wrist and end-effector POR modes. Wrist kinematics resulted in faster performance times, however, with longer average distances traveled while the opposite effect was observed with end-effector kinematics. Reversal errors were present equally in both modes, while the end-effector mode showed higher 1-axis use of the joysticks. Implications for remote robotic operation design and kinematics are discussed.
机译:两个反向运动学算法在远程操作机器人系统中实现并通过用户性能研究进行评估。设计了运动学算法,使得机器人ARM手腕和末端执行器的分辨率(POR)的点由操纵杆控制,每个用于旋转和翻译。使用手腕和末端执行器POR模式使用“PEG-IN-ob-ob-ob-op-op-op”类型任务进行评估操作员性能。然而,手腕运动学导致更快的性能时期,随着末端效应运动学观察到相反的效果,较长的平均距离。在两种模式中同样存在反转误差,而末端效应模式显示出更高的操纵杆的1轴使用。讨论了对远程机器人操作设计和运动学的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号