首页> 外文会议>SPIE Photonics Europe Conference >Freeform optics complexity estimation: comparison of methods
【24h】

Freeform optics complexity estimation: comparison of methods

机译:Freeform光学复杂性估计:方法比较

获取原文

摘要

In the present paper we compare different approaches for estimation of freeform and aspherical surfaces complexity. We consider two unobscured all-reflective telescope designs: a narrow-field Korsch-type system with a slow freeform secaondary and a wide-field Schwarzschild-type system with an extreme freeform secondary. The performance improvement obtained due to the freeforms use is demonstrated. The Korsch telescope provides a diffraction-limited image quality for a small field 0.8x0.1° at F/3. The Schwarzschild design covers a large field of 20x8° and allows to increase the aperture from F/6.7 to F/3. Also, we analyze the freeforms shapes using different techniques. It is shown that the usual measures like root-mean square deviation of the sag are ineffective. One of the recommended way to estimate the surface complexity is computation of the residual slope and its conversion into fringes frequency. A simpler alternative is computation of the sag deviation integral.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了估计自由形状和非球面复杂性的不同方法。我们考虑了两个视野开具的全反线望远镜设计:窄场korsch型系统,具有慢的自由形式Secaondary和宽阔的Schwarzschild型系统,具有极端的自由形式级。证明了由于自由形式使用而获得的性能改进。 Korsch望远镜在F / 3处为小场0.8x0.1°提供衍射限制的图像质量。 Schwarzschild设计占地面积20x8°,允许从F / 6.7到F / 3增加光圈。此外,我们使用不同的技术分析自由形状。结果表明,落后平均方形偏差的通常测量是无效的。估计表面复杂性的推荐方法之一是将残余斜率的计算及其转换为流入频率。更简单的替代方案是计算SAG偏差积分的计算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号