首页> 外文会议>SPIE Photonics Europe Conference >Freeform optics complexity estimation: comparison of methods
【24h】

Freeform optics complexity estimation: comparison of methods

机译:自由形式的光学复杂度估算:方法比较

获取原文

摘要

In the present paper we compare different approaches for estimation of freeform and aspherical surfaces complexity. We consider two unobscured all-reflective telescope designs: a narrow-field Korsch-type system with a slow freeform secaondary and a wide-field Schwarzschild-type system with an extreme freeform secondary. The performance improvement obtained due to the freeforms use is demonstrated. The Korsch telescope provides a diffraction-limited image quality for a small field 0.8x0.1° at F/3. The Schwarzschild design covers a large field of 20x8° and allows to increase the aperture from F/6.7 to F/3. Also, we analyze the freeforms shapes using different techniques. It is shown that the usual measures like root-mean square deviation of the sag are ineffective. One of the recommended way to estimate the surface complexity is computation of the residual slope and its conversion into fringes frequency. A simpler alternative is computation of the sag deviation integral.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了估计自由形式和非球面复杂度的不同方法。我们考虑了两种无遮挡的全反射式望远镜设计:具有慢速自由形式的二元望远镜的窄场Korsch型系统和具有极度自由形式的二次曲面的宽场Schwarzschild型系统。演示了由于使用自由形式而获得的性能改进。 Korsch望远镜在F / 3的小视野0.8x0.1°上提供了衍射极限图像质量。 Schwarzschild设计覆盖20x8°的大视野,并允许将光圈从F / 6.7增加到F / 3。另外,我们使用不同的技术分析自由形状。结果表明,下垂的均方根偏差等常规措施无效。估算表面复杂度的推荐方法之一是计算剩余斜率并将其转换为条纹频率。一种更简单的选择是下垂偏差积分的计算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号