首页> 外文会议>Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers Annual Conference and Expo >Understanding Engineering Identity Formation Mechanisms in Graduate and Undergraduate Education: A State-of-the-Art Matrix Analysis
【24h】

Understanding Engineering Identity Formation Mechanisms in Graduate and Undergraduate Education: A State-of-the-Art Matrix Analysis

机译:了解毕业生和本科教育的工程认同地层机制:最先进的矩阵分析

获取原文

摘要

That engineers are a critical asset to any society that wishes to attain or sustain economic development cannot be understated. Engineers are known to possess unique skillsets and diverse professional characteristics that can be aggregated into what educators and psychologists refer to as "identity," more specifically an "engineering identity." Unfortunately, little is known about the mechanisms underpinning the formation of such identity. This work aims to determine the current state of the research concerning this critical area of engineering education and identify areas for future research. To do so, a State-of-the-Art Matrix (SAM) analysis is performed. Based on this study's results, it is observed that engineering identity per se has not been fully studied at both the undergraduate and graduate levels of engineering education. Even among the limited studies found, the focus of research seems to have predominantly been on the undergraduate level. Such results also evinced two main streams of research concerning engineering identity, one that focuses on the general engineering identity and another one that aims to identify differences in the developed identities formed in engineers across diverse engineering disciplines. Also observed was the existence of only a few theoretical models explaining identity formation mechanisms in engineers. Further studies are recommended to improve the understanding of such a critical phenomenon in engineering education.
机译:该工程师对任何希望实现或维持经济发展的社会都是一个关键资产。众所周知,工程师拥有独特的技能组,可以汇总为教育工作者和心理学家称为“身份”,更具体地说是“工程认同”。不幸的是,关于支撑诸如这种身份的形成的机制很少。这项工作旨在确定关于工程教育的关键领域的研究现状,并确定未来研究领域。为此,执行最先进的矩阵(SAM)分析。根据这项研究的结果,观察到,工程认同本身尚未完全研究工程教育的本科和研究生水平。即使在发现有限的研究中,研究的重点似乎主要是在本科水平上。这些结果也表达了有关工程认同的两个主要研究,一个专注于一般工程认同和另一个旨在确定在各种工程学科的工程师中形成的发达身份差异的差异。还观察到的是仅存在少数理论模型,解释工程师中的身份形成机制。建议进一步研究,以改善对工程教育中这种关键现象的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号