首页> 外文会议>IAA Symposium on Building Blocks for Future Space Exploration and Development;International Astronautical Congress >Space Research Project Management Can Benefit from Engineering Technology Selection Methods
【24h】

Space Research Project Management Can Benefit from Engineering Technology Selection Methods

机译:空间研究项目管理可以从工程技术选择方法中受益

获取原文

摘要

Many engineering methods have been developed to help management select technology for a system design or further research. The simplest way to compare technologies is to use a checklist containing all the more or less important selection criteria, so that nothing is overlooked. The criteria usually include cost, safety, reliability and maintainability, and potential problems such as noise generation and microgravity sensitivity. The next step typically is to weight and score all the criteria. The process of weighting and scoring is helpful in bringing out different priorities and reaching a shared point of view. Group technology selection methods are designed to highlight initial disagreements and produce a shared consensus. Often a frank discussion led by management rather than decision analysts can be more effective. The final selection depends on management and engineering judgment and may include programmatic and organizational factors that are beyond the engineering checklist. The objective of engineering technology selection methods is to provide engineering information to assist management in making sound decisions. Project management and technology selection are assumed to use rational engineering analytic methods, but they often do not. The reason is that human insight, intuition, and "gut feel," rather than logic, more frequently determine our decisions. Project selection and management are strongly influenced by nonrational psychological influences, which can produce unjustified confidence and determination. Nevertheless, there is a strong need for space projects to do rational project analysis and selection. Demonstrating a rational spirit is necessary for a scientific and technical organization. Professional ethics at its best requires an open, honest, and fair process, without damaging politics. Rational analysis can help improve good projects and avoid selecting bad ones. A sanity check using rational analysis guided by a checklist can help avoid egre
机译:已经开发了许多工程方法来帮助管理选择技术设计或进一步研究。比较技术的最简单方法是使用包含所有或多或少重要的选择标准的清单,因此没有被忽视。标准通常包括成本,安全性,可靠性和可维护性,以及噪声发电和微沉降性等潜在问题。下一步通常是重量并得分所有标准。加权和评分的过程有助于提出不同的优先事项并达到共同的观点。组技术选择方法旨在突出初始分歧并产生共享共识。经常由管理领导而不是决策分析师的坦率讨论可能更有效。最终选择取决于管理和工程判断,可能包括超出工程清单之外的程序化和组织因素。工程技术选择方法的目的是提供工程信息,以协助管理进行健全的决策。假设项目管理和技术选择用于使用Rational Engineering Analytic方法,但它们通常不会。原因是人类洞察力,直觉和“肠道感,”而不是逻辑,更频繁地确定我们的决定。项目选择和管理受到非理性心理影响的强烈影响,这可能产生不合理的信心和决心。尽管如此,有很强的需要空间项目来做合理的项目分析和选择。对科学和技术组织来说,表明理性精神是必要的。职业道德的最佳需求要求开放,诚实和公平的过程,而不会损害政治。合理分析可以帮助改善良好的项目,并避免选择糟糕的项目。使用核对清单指导的合理分析的理智检查可以帮助避免EGRE

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号