首页> 外文会议>Health Informatics Meets Digital Healtd Conference >Comparison of Formative Evaluation Methods in the Usability Process on the Example of a Medical App
【24h】

Comparison of Formative Evaluation Methods in the Usability Process on the Example of a Medical App

机译:在医疗应用程序示例中的可用性过程中形成性评估方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background: The process of developing a medical device has become increasingly complex, not least because of the Medical Device Regulation. Some of the associated changes affect in particular the software development companies. One of the challenges to provide safe software products is the usability engineering process. Adequate methods must be identified to find severe usability issues effectively and efficiently. Objectives: The aim of this study was a comparison of normative recommended formative evaluation methods. Methods: Two expertbased methods and two user-based methods were compared regarding effectiveness in finding issues, the level of detail and the temporal effort. Results: The heuristics and the isometrics, both showed a significant advantage regarding the effectiveness and similarity in level of detail and temporal effort. Conclusion: Based on this paper, the heuristics and the isometrics, both can be recommended, but further studies are necessary to consolidate this statement. Also, further methods should be considered, and more test persons must be involved to give an overall comparison of formative evaluation methods in the usability process of medical apps.
机译:背景:开发医疗装置的过程变得越来越复杂,尤其是由于医疗器械调节。一些相关变化尤其影响了软件开发公司。提供安全软件产品的挑战之一是可用性工程过程。必须识别足够的方法以有效且有效地找到严重的可用性问题。目的:本研究的目的是规范推荐的形成性评价方法的比较。方法:比较两种专业的方法和基于两个基于用户的方法,以及在寻找问题的有效性,细节水平和时间努力方面进行了比较。结果:启发式和异构体,两者都对细节和时间努力的有效性和相似性显示出了显着的优势。结论:基于本文,推荐的启发式和异构体,两者都可以推荐,但进一步的研究是巩固这一陈述的必要条件。此外,应考虑进一步的方法,必须涉及更多的测试人员在医疗应用的可用性过程中进行完整比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号