首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law Reform >Factors Inhibiting the Local Regulation-Revoking System in Indonesia
【24h】

Factors Inhibiting the Local Regulation-Revoking System in Indonesia

机译:抑制印度尼西亚局部监管制度的因素

获取原文

摘要

This research was very important to find out the factors inhibiting the Local Regulation revoking system existing in Indonesia. This study was a juridical sociological research, describing the fact existing in the field to be connected later to the existing rule. Data source employed consisted of primary data obtained by method of collecting data closely related to primary and secondary law materials. The author also used statute approach. This study would provide accurate information related to Local Regulation Trial ending up with revocation or whether or not a Local Regulation trialed through Supreme Court (Judicial Reviewer) is valid, because there is a sufficiently complex problem. Previously, many Local Regulations have been revoked by Republic of Indonesia's Ministry of Interior (Executive Reviewer); this number was even more than that revoked by Supreme Court. It became a new problem to the trialing system existing in Supreme Court because the trialing system existing still has weaknesses, particularly in trialing Local Regulation today, recalling the issuance of Constitution Court's decree No. 56/PTU/MK about the authority of revoking Local Regulation in Indonesia reverting to Supreme Court. Thus, the constraint arising included the legislation existing in Indonesia that should be improved in relation to Local Regulation trialing system either formally or materially and the problem of Local Development, Investment, and Local Regulation Supervision in regions.
机译:这项研究非常重要,无法找到抑制印度尼西亚现有的当地监管撤销系统的因素。本研究是法律社会学研究,描述了在稍后将在现有规则中连接的现场的事实。采用的数据源包括通过收集与初级和二级法律密切相关的数据的方法获得的主要数据。作者还使用了法规方法。本研究将提供与当地监管审判有关的准确信息,以撤销或通过最高法院试验的当地监管(司法审阅者)是有效的,因为存在足够复杂的问题。此前,印度尼西亚中央部的共和国内政部(执行审阅者)撤销了许多当地法规;这个数字甚至超过最高法院撤销的数字。它成为最高法院存在的初学系统的新问题,因为现有的初学制度仍然存在劣势,特别是在今天审判当地监管时,回顾宪法法院第56号法令的第56号/ PTU / MK关于撤销当地监管的权力在印度尼西亚恢复最高法院。因此,引起的制约因素包括在印度尼西亚存在的立法,这些立法应该与地方监管制度的正式或物质和地区的地方发展,投资和地方监管问题有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号