首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Reliability and Safety Engineering;National Conference on Reliability and Safety Engineering >Comparative Analysis of Multi-objective Algorithms for Machining Parameters of Optimization of EDM Process
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Multi-objective Algorithms for Machining Parameters of Optimization of EDM Process

机译:多目标算法对EDM过程优化参数的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Recently, several evolutionary algorithms have been formulated with multi objective optimization capabilities. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are gaining popularity with the increasing computational resources. Moreover, in the field of non-conventional manufacturing processes, evolutionary algorithms are emerging as a powerful tools for their highly efficient population based optimal searches. However, in most cases selection of algorithms is based on empirical understanding and no standard resources exist for comparing the performance of such algorithms relevant to the manufacturing domain. This paper compares results of five advanced evolutionary algorithms- Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-III (NSGA-III), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm-II (SPEA-II), Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition (MOEA/D), Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm-II (PESA-II), and Passing Vehicle Search (PVS) algorithm. The performance of EAs are compared using three cases of EDM process. In each case, solution sets for all five optimization methods are recorded. These solution sets are used to plot Pareto optimal plots for visual comparison of performances. To quantitatively ascertain the performance of an algorithm based on the generated solution sets, seven performance metrics are considered - Generational Distance, Inverted Generational Distance, Spacing, Spreading, Hypervolume, and Pure Diversity which are coded usingMATLAB. The combination of these performance metrics determines the cardinality, accuracy and diversity of solution sets in each case. Preliminary studies have shown that NSGA-III has better performances measure in overall terms among the five algorithms. Thus, the results of this study will help researchers in selecting appropriate optimization technique based on the established performance measures of that algorithm.
机译:最近,已经配制了多个进化算法,具有多目标优化能力。进化算法(EAS)正在越来越受到增加的计算资源。此外,在非传统制造过程领域中,进化算法是作为基于高效人群的最佳搜索的强大工具。然而,在大多数情况下,算法的选择基于经验理解,并且没有存在用于比较与制造域相关的算法的性能的标准资源。本文比较了五种先进的进化算法 - 非主导分类遗传算法-III(NSGA-III),强度帕曲型进化算法-II(SPEA-II),基于分解的多目标进化算法(MOEA / D),基于帕累托信封的选择算法-II(PESA-II)和传递车辆搜索(PVS)算法。使用三种EDM过程进行比较EA的性能。在每种情况下,记录所有五种优化方法的解决方案集。这些解决方案集用于绘制Pareto最佳地块以进行性能的视觉比较。为了定量地确定基于所生成的解决方案集的算法的性能,七个性能度量被认为是代理距离,倒置的世代距离,间距,扩展,超凡和纯多样性,这些距离是由Matlab进行编码的。这些性能指标的组合决定了每种情况下解决方案集的基数,准确性和多样性。初步研究表明,NSGA-III在五种算法中具有更好的整体术语表现测量。因此,本研究的结果将帮助研究人员根据该算法的既定性能测量选择适当的优化技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号