【24h】

The Importance of 3D Scanned Mesh Processing in FEM Simulation Results

机译:三维扫描网格处理在有限元模拟结果中的重要性

获取原文

摘要

There are many times when working with mesh elements is unavoidable, and what is more, necessary to obtain a reliable geometry. One of the most common situations of mesh working is reverse engineering, especially if the parts are composed of complex surfaces. When this happens, the reproduction of the product is not an easy task. In those scenarios, it is useful to follow a solid methodology in order to generate the most accurate model from 3D scanned meshes. In this paper, the main differences between the use of parametric models (CAD models) and scanned 3D meshes are discussed. For the parametric design, a complete footwear sole made in Rhinoceros was used. The sole was divided in two well differentiated parts: an outer part made in Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR), and an inner part made in Expanded Polyurethane (E-PUR). The 3D scanned model was obtained with a structured light scanner from the complete sole once it was manufactured. The final scanned model was exported from IDEA software after combining 19 scans, and then modified with Geomagic to separate both parts (outer and inner parts). Both meshes (from parametric models and scanned 3D) were imported in a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software in order to compare their mechanical behavior. In this case, the FEA was used for determining the stress levels into the complete footwear sole during a slip test in both meshes. Stress results showed no significant differences between the two FEA for the same load values. It can be confirmed therefore, that, the use of a 3D scanned model instead of the original CAD is not a cause of significant error if mesh geometry has a minimum quality.
机译:在很多情况下,使用网格元素是不可避免的,而且是获得可靠几何图形所必需的。网格加工最常见的情况之一是逆向工程,尤其是当零件由复杂曲面组成时。当这种情况发生时,产品的复制不是一件容易的事情。在这些情况下,为了从三维扫描网格生成最精确的模型,遵循实体方法非常有用。本文讨论了使用参数化模型(CAD模型)和扫描三维网格之间的主要区别。在参数化设计中,使用了犀牛制成的完整鞋底。鞋底分为两部分:外层由丁腈橡胶(NBR)制成,内层由膨胀聚氨酯(E-PUR)制成。3D扫描模型在制作完成后,通过结构光扫描仪从整个鞋底获得。最终扫描的模型在结合19次扫描后从IDEA软件中导出,然后用Geomagic修改以分离两部分(外部和内部)。这两种网格(来自参数化模型和三维扫描)都导入到有限元分析(FEA)软件中,以比较它们的力学行为。在这种情况下,FEA用于确定在两个网格中进行滑动试验期间整个鞋底的应力水平。应力结果显示,对于相同的载荷值,两种FEA之间没有显著差异。因此,可以确认,如果网格几何体的质量最低,使用三维扫描模型代替原始CAD不会导致重大错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号