首页> 外文会议>Signal Processing and Applied Mathematics for Electronics and Communications >COMPARISON OF POSITIONING ACCURACY OF GRID AND PATH LOSS-BASED MOBILE POSITIONING METHODS USING RECEIVED SIGNAL STRENGTHS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF POSITIONING ACCURACY OF GRID AND PATH LOSS-BASED MOBILE POSITIONING METHODS USING RECEIVED SIGNAL STRENGTHS

机译:基于网格损失的移动定位方法的定位精度比较使用接收信号强度

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, positioning accuracy of two basic mobile positioning methods based on Received Signal Strength (RSS) measurements is compared via comprehensive simulations. The first method is a path loss-based technique using general free-space loss model and brute-force algorithm. The second method is a grid (fingerprint)-based positioning approach, with averaging over several nearest neighbor grid points. In the analysis, these two methods are compared in various outdoor scenarios using Matlab simulations. It is shown that the grid-based method performs better when fast fading is present and/or shadowing variance is 10 dB or more, even if path loss parameters are perfectly estimated. In addition, for the grid-based method, the optimal choice of the number of neighbor points for averaging is shown.
机译:在本文中,通过综合模拟比较了基于接收信号强度(RSS)测量的两个基本移动定位方法的定位精度。第一种方法是使用一般自由空间丢失模型和蛮力算法的基于路径损耗的技术。第二种方法是基于网格(指纹)的定位方法,其平均在几个最近的邻居网格点上。在分析中,使用Matlab模拟在各种户外场景中比较这两种方法。结果表明,当存在快速衰落和/或阴影方差为10dB或更大时,基于网格的方法更好,即使是完全估计路径损耗参数。另外,对于基于网格的方法,示出了用于平均值的相邻点数的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号