首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society international annual meeting >JOINT HUMAN-AUTOMATION DECISION MAKING IN ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
【24h】

JOINT HUMAN-AUTOMATION DECISION MAKING IN ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

机译:道路交通管理联合人体自动化决策

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we explore automation bias in terms of joint decision making between humans and automation. In an experiment, participants made decisions, and indicated the reason for this decision, in a road traffic monitoring task with the aid of automation of varying reliability (i.e., 25% or 81%). Reliability level had a clear impact on the user’s behavior: at low reliability, participants ignored automation suggestion and rely on their own decision making, whereas in the high reliability condition, participants tended to accept the automation suggestion (even if this was incorrect). Overall, performance is higher as a result of the human intervention that would be expected from automation alone, i.e., accuracy is in the region of 87-96% on all conditions. Performance is affected by the order in which the human and automation give their answers and how much detail they are required to provide. We consider these results in terms of a theory of joint decision making. [156 words]
机译:在本文中,我们在人类与自动化之间的联合决策方面探讨自动化偏见。在一个实验中,参与者在道路交通监测任务中借助不同的可靠性(即25%或81%),指出了这一决定的原因。可靠性水平对用户的行为产生明显影响:以低可靠性,参与者忽略了自动化建议并依靠自己的决策,而在高可靠性条件下,参与者倾向于接受自动化建议(即使这是不正确的)。总体而言,由于人类干预,性能更高,这是人们预期的自动化,即,准确性在所有条件下的准确性为87-96%。性能受人类和自动化给出答案以及提供的详细信息提供的顺序。我们考虑这些结果在联合决策理论方面。 [156字]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号