【24h】

JOINT HUMAN-AUTOMATION DECISION MAKING IN ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

机译:公路交通管理中的人为共同决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we explore automation bias in terms of joint decision makingrnbetween humans and automation. In an experiment, participants maderndecisions, and indicated the reason for this decision, in a road trafficrnmonitoring task with the aid of automation of varying reliability (i.e., 25% orrn81%). Reliability level had a clear impact on the user’s behavior: at lowrnreliability, participants ignored automation suggestion and rely on their ownrndecision making, whereas in the high reliability condition, participants tendedrnto accept the automation suggestion (even if this was incorrect). Overall,rnperformance is higher as a result of the human intervention that would bernexpected from automation alone, i.e., accuracy is in the region of 87-96% onrnall conditions. Performance is affected by the order in which the human andrnautomation give their answers and how much detail they are required tornprovide. We consider these results in terms of a theory of joint decisionrnmaking. [156 words]
机译:在本文中,我们从人与自动化之间的联合决策角度探讨了自动化偏差。在一项实验中,参与者在具有不同可靠性的自动化(即25%或81%)的帮助下,在道路交通监控任务中做出了决定并指出了做出此决定的原因。可靠性水平对用户的行为有着明显的影响:可靠性较低时,参与者会忽略自动化建议,而是依靠自己的决策制定,而在可靠性较高的情况下,参与者往往会接受自动化建议(即使这是不正确的)。总体而言,由于人为干预的效果更高,这是单独从自动化中所期望的结果,即在所有条件下精度都在87-96%左右。绩效受人类自动化给出答案的顺序以及需要提供多少细节的影响。我们根据联合决策理论来考虑这些结果。 [156个字]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号