首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Agriculture and the Environment >Determination of Land Productivity Dynamic Trend for and Degradation in Two Adjacent Micro Catchments
【24h】

Determination of Land Productivity Dynamic Trend for and Degradation in Two Adjacent Micro Catchments

机译:两种相邻微集型中土地生产力动力趋势的测定

获取原文

摘要

Land productivity is an expression of the bio-productivity resulting from all land components and their interactions for region-wide assessment, not just those related to human activities and direct use. Land productivity is therefore not to be confused with just agricultural productivity (Cherlet et al., 2013). The main goals of this study were to determine i) changing of land use and land cover, ii) vegetation cover density iii) trends in land productivity and iv) the situation of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in different land uses and land covers. This study was carried out in two adjacent micro catchments located in the Gediz River Basin in western Turkey. The study area covers about 16647 ha and its elevation changes between 70 m and 760 mabove sea level. In order to determination land cover and land use changes and NDVI, Landsat7 ETM+ and Landsat8 OLI/TIRS satellite images for May 2001 and May 2015 having about 30 m spatial resolution were used. For determination of the status of soil organic carbon levels, 320 soil samples were systematically collected from surface soils (0-30 cm) and geostatistical methods were used to generate an SOC distribution map for the study area. After image analysis, the amount of area that had changed for land use and land cover types was determined. From 2001 to 2015, forests increased about 321.8 ha (1.93%) due to afforestation, whereas shrubs, grasslands, and sparsely vegetated areas decreased about 6.35% due to conversion to artificial lands and croplands. Accuracy assessment is critical for maps generated from any remotely sensed data, and was the final step of the classification process. An error matrix is the most common way to present the accuracy of the classification results (Fan et al., 2007). The overall accuracy, user's and producer's accuracies, and the Kappa statistic were then derived from the error matrices for the various land use classes. Kappa analysis is a discrete multivariate technique used in accuracy assessments (Moller-Jensen, 1997). According to Congalton (1996), accuracy of the classification analysis result showed that the producer's accuracy and user's accuracy for individual classes of the 2001 and 2015 maps were greater than 80%, indicating strong agreement in this study.Percentage and hectare distributions of the land productivity dynamic (LPD) showed a comparable pattern within all land cover classes (Table 1, Figure 1). 21.86% of the territory showed a stable, not stressed, LPD.
机译:土地生产力是所有土地部件产生的生物生产率的表达及其对区域范围内评估的相互作用,而不仅仅是与人类活动和直接使用有关的生物生产率。因此,土地生产率不与农业生产力(Cherlet等,2013年)混淆。本研究的主要目标是确定I)植被覆盖密度III的植被覆盖密度III)趋势和IV的趋势)土壤有机碳(SOC)股在不同土地使用和陆地覆盖中的情况。本研究在位于土耳其西部Gediz河流域的两个相邻的微观集水区中进行。研究区占地面积约16647公顷,其高程变化在70米和760米的海平面。为了确定陆地覆盖和土地利用变化和NDVI,Landsat7 ETM +和Landsat8 Oli / Tirs 2001年5月和2015年5月的卫星图像,使用了大约30米的空间分辨率。为了测定土壤有机碳水平的状态,从表面土壤(0-30cm)系统地收集320个土壤样品,使用地质统计方法为研究区域产生SOC分布图。在图像分析之后,确定了用于土地使用和陆地覆盖类型的区域的量。从2001年到2015年,由于造林,森林增加了约321.8公顷(1.93%),而灌木,草原和稀疏的植被区由于对人工土地和农作物的转换而下降约6.35%。精度评估对于从任何远程感测数据生成的地图至关重要,并且是分类过程的最后步骤。错误矩阵是呈现分类结果准确性的最常见方式(FAN等人,2007)。然后,总体准确性,用户和生产者的准确性,以及kappa统计数据从各种土地使用类的错误矩阵派生。 Kappa分析是一种用于准确评估的离散多变量技术(Moller-Jensen,1997)。根据Congalton(1996)的说法,分类分析结果的准确性表明,生产者的准确性和用户对2001年和2015年地图的各个类别的准确性大于80%,表明本研究中的恰当。土地的Percentage和公顷分布。生产率动态(LPD)在所有陆地覆盖类别中显示了可比模式(表1,图1)。 21.86%的领土显示稳定,不强调,LPD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号