首页> 外文会议>International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium >Comparison of Split-Window and Single-Channel Methods for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from MODIS and AATSR Data
【24h】

Comparison of Split-Window and Single-Channel Methods for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from MODIS and AATSR Data

机译:MODIS和AATSR数据的拆分窗口和单通道方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this study, two different methods for retrieving the Land Surface Temperature (LST) from Terra/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Envisat/Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) data are compared against a database of ground measured LSTs. These are the split-window (SW) and the single-channel (SC) methods. The SW method expresses LST as a combination of the brightness temperatures in the 11 ??m and 12 ??m channels with coefficients that can have local or global validity, depending on the way they are obtained. SC methods are based on the atmospheric radiative transfer equation. To solve this equation, convenient atmospheric temperature and water vapor profiles are required as inputs of a radiative transfer model. In this work we used three different sources of atmospheric profiles: local radiosoundings (LR) reanalysis model output (RM), and satellite-based profiles (SB). Results show that the SW method produces more accurate LST retrievals (?±0.5 K) than the SC method with the three profile sources used, of which the RM source yielded the best results (?±1.0 K).
机译:在该研究中,将来自Terra /中度分辨率成像分光镜(MODIS)和沿轨道扫描辐射计(AATSR)数据的陆地表面温度(MODIS)和Envisat /先进的两种不同的方法与地面测量的LST数据库进行比较。这些是拆分窗口(SW)和单通道(SC)方法。 SW方法表示LST作为11 ?? M和12 ?? M通道的亮度温度的组合,其系数可以具有本地或全球有效性,具体取决于它们的方式。 SC方法基于大气辐射转移方程。为了解决这个方程,需要方便的大气温度和水蒸气轮廓作为辐射转移模型的输入。在这项工作中,我们使用了三种不同的大气配置文件来源:本地放射线(LR)重新分析模型输出(RM)和基于卫星的型材(SB)。结果表明,SW方法比使用的三种轮廓源的SC方法产生更精确的LST检索(±0.5 k),其中RM源产生了最佳结果(?±1.0 k)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号