【24h】

Do Bots Have Moral Judgement? The Difference Between Bots and Humans in Moral Rhetoric

机译:机器人有道德判断吗?道德修辞中的机器人与人类之间的差异

获取原文

摘要

Understanding moral foundations can yield powerful results in terms of perceiving the intended meaning of the text data, as the concept of morality provides additional information on the unobservable characteristics of information processing and non-conscious cognitive processes. Considering that moral values vary significantly across cultures and yet many recurrent themes are observed and that each culture builds its societal and ideological narratives on top of its moral virtues, an enhanced understanding of morality can prove to be a valuable tool in deterring disinformation narratives by adversaries. Therefore, we investigate the evolution of latent moral loadings over time and across different sub-narratives on human and bot-generated tweets. For this purpose, we analyze the Syrian White Helmets-related tweets from April 1st, 2018 to April 30th, 2019. For the operationalization and quantification of moral rhetoric in tweets, we use Moral Foundations Dictionary in which five psychological dimensions (Harm/Care, Subversion/Authority, Cheating/Fairness, Betrayal/Loyalty and Degradation/Purity) are considered. Our results present the significant differences between the strength and patterns of moral rhetoric for human and bot-generated content on Twitter.
机译:理解道德基础可以在感知文本数据的预期含义方面产生强大的结果,因为道德的概念提供了有关信息处理和未经意识的认知过程的不可观察特征的额外信息。考虑到文化中的道德价值观显着变化,并且观察到许多经常性主题,并且每个文化都在其道德美德之上建立了其社会和思想叙事,这一思想的理解可以成为一种有价值的工具,可以成为对逆势遏制逆向叙事的有价值的工具。因此,我们调查随着时间的推移和跨越人类和机器人生成的推文的不同子叙事的演变。为此目的,我们从2018年4月1日至2019年4月30日分析了叙利亚白喉相关的推文。对于推文中的道德修辞的运作和量化,我们使用道德基础,其中五个心理维度(伤害/护理,考虑颠覆/权力,作弊/公平,背叛/忠诚度和退化/纯度)。我们的结果呈现了在Twitter上为人类和BOT产生的含量的强度和模式之间的实力和模式之间的显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号