首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World >DGFI-TUM Analysis and Scale Investigations of the Latest Terrestrial Reference Frame Realizations
【24h】

DGFI-TUM Analysis and Scale Investigations of the Latest Terrestrial Reference Frame Realizations

机译:DGFI-TUM的分析和规模调查最新的陆地参考框架实现

获取原文

摘要

Solutions for the most recent realization of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) were computed by the three ITRS Combination Centers (CCs) of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), namely the IGN in Paris (France), the JPL in Pasadena (USA), and the DGFI-TUM in Munich (Germany). Thereby, the solutions of IGN and DGFI-TUM comprise conventional parameters of the ITRS (station coordinates and velocities) at a reference epoch as defined in the IERS Conventions 2010. Although the two solutions are based on identical input data, there exist systematic differences between them. Within all ITRS realizations, the scale is realized as a mean scale between SLR (satellite laser ranging) and VLBI (very long baseline interferometry). If the combined scale is compared to the scale realized by both techniques itself, the IGN solution reveals significant differences between SLR and VLBI whereas the DGFI-TUM solution shows much smaller differences. When the combined solutions of IGN and DGFI-TUM as well as the single-technique solutions of both institutions are investigated and compared, a significant scale difference between SLR and VLBI is only visible in the IGN analysis but not in the results of the two other ITRS CCs. It is also found that the scale analysis via Helmert parameter is very difficult since the results are quite sensitive w.r.t. particular station networks. In addition, scale comparisons of the IVS and ILRS CCs also do not confirm a systematic scale offset.
机译:国际地球旋转和参考系统服务(IERS)的三个ITRS联合中心(CCS)计算了国际地面参考系统(ITRS)的最新实现的解决方案,即巴黎(法国)的IGG在帕萨迪纳(美国)和慕尼黑(德国)的DGFI-TUM。因此,IGN和DGFI-TUM的解包括在IERS 10010中定义的参考时期的ITRS(站坐标和速度)的常规参数。虽然这两个解决方案基于相同的输入数据,但是之间存在系统的差异他们。在所有ITRS的实现中,比例在SLR(卫星激光测距)和VLBI(非常长的基线干涉测量)之间实现为平均量表。如果将组合的比例与两种技术本身实现的规模进行了比较,则IGN解决方案揭示了SLR和VLBI之间的显着差异,而DGFI-TUM溶液显示得多较小的差异。调查AGN和DGFI-TUM的组合解决方案以及两个机构的单技术解决方案时,SLR和VLBI之间的显着规模差异仅在IMG分析中可见,但不在另外两个的结果中可见ITRS CCS。还发现,由于结果非常敏感,因此通过Helmert参数的比例分析非常困难。特定的电台网络。此外,IVS和ILRS CC的规模比较也不确认系统刻度偏移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号