首页> 外文会议>Annual International Conference on Management Research >Third Party Logistic Selection Analysis with the Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study on PT Pro Health International
【24h】

Third Party Logistic Selection Analysis with the Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study on PT Pro Health International

机译:分析层次处理的第三方物流选择分析 - 以PT Pro Health International为例

获取原文

摘要

This research aims to understand how to determine third party logistic at PT. Pro-Health International using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Sampling technique used nonprobability sampling with saturated sampling method, because AHP method require depend on the group of experts as according to relevant specialist in decision making so that all members of eligible population are used as sample. Related respondent must to know third party logistic performance which serve as an alternative choice, then the respondent is determined as many as six persons. AHP method is done through five steps (to construct a hierarchical structure of the problem, to make a matrix of pairwise comparison, calculate the weight/priority of each criterion, then calculate the weight/priority of each alternative choice, and to make a choice). The final rating of relative importance third party logistic selection criteria was found: priority I is price (0,289), priority II is punctuality (0,210), priority III is access (0,181), priority IV is communication (0,175), and priority V is responsiveness (0,144). The final rating of relative importance alternative was found: first priority is DHL (0,390), second priority is FedEx (0,359), and the last priority is TNT (0,250). From this result, we can suggest if company will develop partner relationship, majored to chosen DHL as the third logistic party, because DHL third party logistic with the highest overall value.
机译:本研究旨在了解如何确定PT的第三方物流。使用分析层次处理(AHP)方法的亲保健国际。采样技术使用饱和采样方法的非可行性采样,因为AHP方法需要根据决策中的相关专家依赖于专家组,以便所有符合条件人口的成员用作样本。相关的受访者必须知道第三方后勤表现,该表现作为替代选择,那么被访者确定多达六个人。 AHP方法是通过五个步骤(构造问题的层次结构,以制作成对比较的矩阵,计算每个标准的权重/优先级,然后计算每个替代选择的权重/优先级,并做出选择)。找到了相对重要性第三方物流选择标准的最终评级:优先权i价格(0,289),优先权II是守声节(0,210),优先权III是访问(0,181),优先级是通信(0,175),优先级v是响应能力(0,144)。找到了相对重要性替代方案的最终评分:首要任务是DHL(0,390),第二优先级是FedEx(0,359),最后优先级为TNT(0,250)。从这个结果来看,我们可以建议公司是否会培养合作伙伴关系,主修选择DHL作为第三个后勤党,因为DHL第三方逻辑的总体价值最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号