首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies >Social Identity Factors in Judging the Civil Liability for Personality Right Infringement: Based on Article 779 of the Divisions of Civil Code (Draft)
【24h】

Social Identity Factors in Judging the Civil Liability for Personality Right Infringement: Based on Article 779 of the Divisions of Civil Code (Draft)

机译:社会认同因素在判断人格权侵权的民事责任:基于民法典司(草案)第779条

获取原文

摘要

The division of personality rights in the Divisions of Civil Code (Draft) of China stipulates the social identity, and regards social identity as one of the considerations in judging the civil liability for personality right infringement. This may be due to the fact that Chinese have long had unclear distinction between social identity and legal identity, and conceptually paid more attention to social identity than legal identity. In judicial practice, the judge and the parties also have a large number of considerations on identity factors in the sharing of responsibilities and the distribution of rights and obligations. Indeed, under the premise of formal equality and individuals' freedom development, there is inevitable difference between their substantive identities. However since modern times, the equality of personality in worldwide public and private laws has been established, and the concept of modern human rights also emphasizes the equality and freedom of people. The setting of the personality right in the Civil Code should comply with and guarantee the equality clause in the Constitution, and provide basic judicial guarantees for eliminating identity discrimination and realizing social justice. Legal workers should systematically isolate social identity from legal identity, face the factual differences between people, and use the compelling power of laws and policies to guide and adjust social distribution relations, correct some existing identity privilege status, and enhance the compensation to the weak.
机译:中国民法(草案)分部的人格权限司规定了社会认同,并将社会认同视为评判人格权侵权人格权责任的考虑之一。这可能是由于中国人在社会身份和法律认同之间的区别不明确,并且概念上的重视社会身份的关注而不是法律认同。在司法实践中,法官和各方在分享责任和权力和义务分配中也有大量关于身份因素的审议。实际上,在正规平等和个人自由发展的前提下,他们的实质性身份之间存在不可避免的差异。然而,自近代以来,全球公共和私人法律的个性平等成立,现代人权的概念也强调了人们的平等和自由。民法典中的人格的设定应遵守并保证宪法中的平等条款,并为消除身份歧视和实现社会正义提供基本的司法担保。法律工人应该系统地将社会形式孤立,面对人与人之间的事实差异,并利用法律和政策的令人信服的权力来指导和调整社会分配关系,纠正一些现有的身份特权状况,并加强对弱者的赔偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号