Compare MPPT method between P&O and IC systems. Rapidly growing renewable energy is wind power. The rapid growth is due to the fact that the world has a great resource of wind energy. Wind energy has been estimated to be capable of suppressing up to 10% of the entire world's electrical energy. Availability uncertain winds became the main issue on wind energy. Because wind power systems, power issued on wind power system depends on wind speed. One of the common methods developed researchers is Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Control. Generally, MPPT methods can be broadly classified into those that do not use sensors and those that do use sensors. The methods without sensors track the MPP by monitoring the power variation. Method use sensors is widely divided into perturbation and observation (P&O) and incremental conductance (IC). The use of the P&O method does not need information and parameters of wind speed wind turbines making it more efficient and has the lowest price. This method has a simple feedback and measurement of some parameters. IC has a performance level close to P&O, but in general the higher implementation cost compared to P&O would not be justified by an improvement in performance. On this paper, researcher mean compare MPPT methode between P&O and IC systems. Researchers intend to want to compare several MPPT methods to find out the type of the MPPT has the best effectiveness. This research resulted that MPPT control type P&O has the results of a greater power output than the type IC. P&O generates its power output value is 1050 Watts while the IC produces a power output is 550 Watts. A comparison between the IC and P&O on the conditions of starting to move torque on the power absorption, P&O results the smallest power absorption than IC that is 25 Nm while the IC of 29 Nm. Whereas in normal conditions, the IC results the smallest power absorption that is IC 3 Nm and P&O of 4.5 Nm.
展开▼
