首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition >Risk Factors Affecting Delays in Upstream Natural Gas Mega-Projects: An Australian Perspective
【24h】

Risk Factors Affecting Delays in Upstream Natural Gas Mega-Projects: An Australian Perspective

机译:影响上游天然气巨型项目延迟的危险因素:澳大利亚视角

获取原文

摘要

The rapid expansion of the Australian gas industry has seen massive investment in mega-projects,but benefits from this have been impeded by the impact of severe project delays. Risks causing delays in upstream mega-projects are high,leading to frequent cost and schedule overruns. However,the absence of research concerning delays during this complex phase of mega-projects provides the opportunity to critically examine underlying challenges experienced by various project participants involved in upstream gas projects in Australia. Data was gathered through an extensive literature review,interviews with industry experts,and a survey. A list of risk factors extracted from the literature was checked with industry experts for relevance in upstream mega-projects,and missing risks were added. The survey was circulated to a random sample of people working within the natural gas projects domain,including clients,consultants,and contractor organisations. Using Likert-style five-point scales,participants rated the frequency of occurrence and severity of each of the risks impacting delays. A total of 70 risk factors were identified,which were then traced back to 10 risk sources that impact delays in upstream gas projects. The findings reveal that 72% of participants believe that the average delay in gas projects is between 10% and 30% in Australia. Moreover,93% of participants mentioned that schedule slippage in the upstream phase causes severe challenges in attaining”first gas”and results in overall project delays. Based on the frequency of occurrence and severity indices,the magnitude of risk factors and sources was used to ascertain critical risks causing major delays. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to check the differences in perception of risk criticality influencing delays among the participants,who differed depending on work experience,job position,and the type of participants’company. These tests indicated a good association in such perceptions. Key risk factors causing major delays included frequent change orders being issued by clients,unrealistic time schedules imposed on contracts,and poor organisational structures. Risks in mega-projects cannot be eliminated completely. However,a more precise identification and prioritisation of risks causing major delays,along with differences in risk perceptions of various project parties,will provide an informed and broader perspective to industry practitioners and stakeholders in managing risks more effectively to reduce upstream gas project delays.
机译:澳大利亚天然气行业的快速扩张已经看到了大型项目的大规模投资,但受益于严重项目延误的影响受到影响。造成延误的风险较高的项目延迟高,导致频繁成本和进度超支。然而,在大型项目的这个复杂阶段期间没有研究延迟的研究提供了批判性地审查澳大利亚上游气体项目的各种项目参与者所经历的潜在挑战。数据通过广泛的文献综述,与行业专家进行访谈以及调查。从文献中提取的危险因素列表,并在上游兆瓦项目中进行了相关的行业专家检查,并增加了缺失的风险。该调查分发给在天然气项目领域内工作的随机样本,包括客户,顾问和承包商组织。使用李克特风格的五点比例,参与者评定了影响延迟的每个风险的发生频率和严重程度。确定了70种风险因素,然后追溯到10个风险源,这些风险源影响上游气体项目的延误。调查结果表明,72%的参与者认为,澳大利亚的天然气项目的平均延误在10%至30%之间。此外,93%的参与者提到了上游阶段的日程点滑动导致恢复“第一天然气”的严重挑战,并导致整体项目延误。基于出现和严重指数的频率,风险因素和来源的大小用于确定造成重大延误的危急风险。 Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U测试用于检查影响参与者之间延误的风险临界感知的差异,根据工作经验,工作岗位和参与者的类型。这些测试表明了这种看法的良好关联。造成重大延误的关键风险因素包括客户颁发的频繁更改订单,在合同上施加不切实际的时间表,以及贫困的组织结构。 Mega-Projects的风险无法完全消除。然而,更精确的鉴定和优先考虑导致主要延误的风险,以及各个项目缔约方的风险看法的差异,将为行业从业者和利益相关者提供知情和更广泛的观点,以更有效地管理风险,以减少上游燃气项目延误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号