首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Quantitative Phase Imaging >A robust holographic autofocusing criterion based on edge sparsity:Comparison of Gini index and Tamura coefficient for holographic autofocusing based on the edge sparsity of the complex optical wavefront
【24h】

A robust holographic autofocusing criterion based on edge sparsity:Comparison of Gini index and Tamura coefficient for holographic autofocusing based on the edge sparsity of the complex optical wavefront

机译:基于边缘稀疏性的鲁棒全息自动聚焦标准:基于复合光波前波前的边缘稀疏性的全息自动聚焦的GINI指数和Tamura系数的比较

获取原文

摘要

The Sparsity of the Gradient(SoG)is a robust autofocusing criterion for holography, where the gradient modulus of the complex refocused hologram is calculated, on which a sparsity metric is applied. Here, we compare two different choices of sparsity metrics used in SoG, specifically, the Gini index(GI)and the Tamura coefficient(TC), for holographic autofocusing on dense/connected or sparse samples. We provide a theoretical analysis predicting that for uniformly distributed image data, TC and GI exhibit similar behavior, while for naturally sparse images containing few high-valued signal entries and many low-valued noisy background pixels, TC is more sensitive to distribution changes in the signal and more resistive to background noise. These predictions are also confirmed by experimental results using SoG-based holographic autofocusing on dense and connected samples(such as stained breast tissue sections)as well as highly sparse samples(such as isolated Giardia lamblia cysts). Through these experiments, we found that ToG and GoG offer almost identical autofocusing performance on dense and connected samples, whereas for naturally sparse samples,GoG should be calculated on a relatively small region of interest(ROI)closely surrounding the object, while ToG offers more flexibility in choosing a larger ROI containing more background pixels.
机译:梯度(SOG)的稀疏性是全能的稳健自动聚焦标准,其中计算复杂重新分段全息图的梯度模数,在该梯度模数上施加在其上施加稀疏度量。在这里,我们比较SOG中使用的两种不同选择的稀疏度量,具体地,基尼指数(GI)和Tamura系数(TC),用于密集/连接或稀疏样品上的全息自动聚焦。我们提供了一个理论分析,预测,对于均匀分布的图像数据,TC和GI表现出类似的行为,而对于包含少量高值信号条目的自然稀疏图像和许多低值嘈杂的背景像素,TC对分布变化更敏感信号和更电阻背景噪音。这些预测也通过使用基于SOG的全息自动聚焦物体上的致密和连接样品(例如染色的乳腺组织切片)以及高稀疏样品(例如分离的Giardia Lamblia囊肿)来证实这些预测。通过这些实验,我们发现TOG和GOG在密集和连接的样本上提供了几乎相同的自动聚焦性能,而对于自然稀疏的样本,GOG应在围绕物体周围的相对较小的兴趣区域(ROI)区域上计算GOG,而TOG则提供更多选择较大的ROI包含更多背景像素的灵活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号