首页> 外文会议>Conference on quantitative phase imaging >A robust holographic autofocusing criterion based on edge sparsity: Comparison of Gini index and Tamura coefficient for holographic autofocusing based on the edge sparsity of the complex optical wavefront
【24h】

A robust holographic autofocusing criterion based on edge sparsity: Comparison of Gini index and Tamura coefficient for holographic autofocusing based on the edge sparsity of the complex optical wavefront

机译:基于边缘稀疏性的鲁棒全息自动聚焦准则:基于复杂光学波前边缘稀疏性的全息自动聚焦的基尼系数和田村系数的比较

获取原文

摘要

The Sparsity of the Gradient (SoG) is a robust autofocusing criterion for holography, where the gradient modulus of the complex refocused hologram is calculated, on which a sparsity metric is applied. Here, we compare two different choices of sparsity metrics used in SoG, specifically, the Gini index (GI) and the Tamura coefficient (TC), for holographic autofocusing on dense/connected or sparse samples. We provide a theoretical analysis predicting that for uniformly distributed image data, TC and GI exhibit similar behavior, while for naturally sparse images containing few high-valued signal entries and many low-valued noisy background pixels, TC is more sensitive to distribution changes in the signal and more resistive to background noise. These predictions are also confirmed by experimental results using SoG-based holographic autofocusing on dense and connected samples (such as stained breast tissue sections) as well as highly sparse samples (such as isolated Giardia lamblia cysts). Through these experiments, we found that ToG and GoG offer almost identical autofocusing performance on dense and connected samples, whereas for naturally sparse samples, GoG should be calculated on a relatively small region of interest (ROI) closely surrounding the object, while ToG offers more flexibility in choosing a larger ROI containing more background pixels.
机译:梯度稀疏度(SoG)是全息术的一种强大的自动聚焦标准,其中计算了复杂的重新聚焦全息图的梯度模量,并在其上应用了稀疏度度量。在这里,我们比较了SoG中使用的稀疏度度量标准的两种不同选择,特别是基尼系数(GI)和田村系数(TC),用于全息自动聚焦在密集/连通或稀疏样本上。我们提供了一项理论分析,预测对于均匀分布的图像数据,TC和GI表现出相似的行为,而对于自然稀疏的图像,其中包含很少的高值信号条目和许多低值的嘈杂背景像素,TC对图像中的分布变化更敏感。信号,并且对背景噪声更具抵抗力。使用基于SoG的全息自动聚焦技术对密集和相连的样本(例如染色的乳房组织切片)以及高度稀疏的样本(例如孤立的贾第鞭毛虫兰氏囊肿)进行的实验结果也证实了这些预测。通过这些实验,我们发现ToG和GoG在密集和连接的样本上提供几乎相同的自动聚焦性能,而对于自然稀疏的样本,GoG应该在物体周围较小的相对感兴趣区域(ROI)上进行计算,而ToG提供更多选择包含更多背景像素的更大ROI的灵活性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Conference on quantitative phase imaging》|2018年|105030J.1-105030J.10|共10页
  • 会议地点 San Francisco(US)
  • 作者单位

    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA Bioengineering Department University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI) University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA;

    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA Bioengineering Department University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI) University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA Department of Surgery David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Optical imaging; Microscopy; Digital holography; Holographic autofocusing; Sparsity metric;

    机译:光学成像;显微镜;数字全息术;全息自动对焦;稀疏度指标;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号