首页> 外文会议>Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership >Developing the Two-Tiers Multiple Choice Test Based on Content, Construct and Language Feasibility in Identifying Students' High-Order Thinking Skills
【24h】

Developing the Two-Tiers Multiple Choice Test Based on Content, Construct and Language Feasibility in Identifying Students' High-Order Thinking Skills

机译:根据内容,构建和语言可行性在识别学生的高阶思维技能方面开发双层多项选择测试

获取原文

摘要

This type of research is a Research and Development (R & D) referred to Borg & Gall model. The aims of this study were to find out the content, construct, and language feasibility of the two tiers multiple choice test that have been developed. The data obtained was adjusted to the objectives and development models used to the type of data to be collected in this development is quantitative description data as the main data, collected through items or two tiers multiple choice instruments that students have answered using scoring guidelines from Bayrak (2013). The results showed that the validation of material/content feasibility indicators assessed by material/content validators indicated that the assessment score obtained was 10, the average score was is 3.33, with a very feasible category. The validation of construct feasibility indicators assessed by the construction validators indicated that the assessment score obtained was 33, the average score was 3.44, with a feasible category. The validation of language feasibility indicators assessed by language validators indicated that the assessment score obtained was 15, the average value was 3.75, with a very feasible category. Based on the average score of indicator assessed by the validator teams consisting of 3 indicators; material/content, construct and language feasibility obtained the average value of 4 with a very feasible category.
机译:这种类型的研究是一项研究和开发(R&D)提到了Borg&Gall模型。本研究的目的是找出已经开发的两层多项选择测试的内容,构建和语言可行性。所获得的数据被调整为用于在该开发中收集的数据类型的目标和开发模型,是定量描述数据作为主要数据,通过项目或两层多种选择仪器收集,学生使用Bayrak的评分指南回答了学生回答(2013)。结果表明,材料/内容验证器评估的材料/内容可行性指标的验证表明,所获得的评估评分为10,平均得分为3.33,具有非常可行的类别。建筑验证者评估的构建性可行性指标的验证表明,获得的评估评分为33,平均得分为3.44,具有可行的类别。语言验证器评估的语言可行性指标的验证表明获得的评估评分为15,平均值为3.75,具有非常可行的类别。根据由3个指标组成的验证者团队评估的指标的平均分数;材料/内容,构造和语言可行性获得了一个非常可行的类别的平均值4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号