首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Experience >Comparison of Total Fatigue Life Predictions of Welded and Machined A36 Steel T-Joints
【24h】

Comparison of Total Fatigue Life Predictions of Welded and Machined A36 Steel T-Joints

机译:焊接和加工A36钢T关节总疲劳寿命预测的比较

获取原文

摘要

A new total fatigue life methodology was utilized to make fatigue life predictions, where total fatigue life is defined as crack initiation and subsequent crack propagation to a crack of known size or the component’s inability to carry load. Fatigue life predictions of an A36 steel T-joint geometry were calculated using the same total fatigue life methodology for both welded and machined test specimens that have the same geometry. The only significant difference between the two analyses was the inclusion of the measured weld residual stresses in the welded specimen life predictions. Constant amplitude tests at several load levels and R ratios were analyzed along with block cycle and variable amplitude loading tests. The accuracy of the life predictions relative to experimental test lives was excellent, with most within a factor of +/- two. Also, welded joint fatigue life predictions demonstrate approximately the same accuracy as the machined joint fatigue life predictions when compared to their experimental test fatigue results. When the welded and machined analysis results were overlaid, the two sets of analysis results appear to be consistent with each other.
机译:利用新的总疲劳寿命方法来制造疲劳寿命预测,其中总疲劳寿命被定义为裂纹启动和随后的裂纹传播与已知尺寸的裂缝或部件无法承载负荷的裂缝。使用具有相同几何形状的焊接和机加工试样的相同总疲劳寿命方法计算A36钢T关节几何形状的疲劳寿命预测。两种分析之间的唯一显着差异是在焊接标本寿命预测中包含测量的焊接残余应力。分析了几种负载水平和R比的恒定幅度测试以及块周期和可变幅度加载测试。相对于实验测试生命的生命预测的准确性优异,大部分在+/-两倍之内。此外,与其实验测试疲劳结果相比,焊接关节疲劳寿命预测显示大致相同的精度随着加工的关节疲劳寿命预测。当焊接和加工分析结果覆盖时,两组分析结果似乎彼此一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号