首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts, and Management Engineering >Research on Models of Individual Accounts in Pension Insurance
【24h】

Research on Models of Individual Accounts in Pension Insurance

机译:养老保险中个别账户模型研究

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To conduct a Comparative Analysis of three models of individual pension accounts from the perspective of management, efficiency, security level and other aspects. Methods: Matlab modeling is employed for empirical quantitative analysis of insurance fund operation the three different models. Results: (1) In terms of total value of pension, replacement rate and other indicators, the security level of NDC≈FDC>real accounts; (2) In terms of longitudinal connotative rate of return, NDC>FDC>real accounts; (3) compared with the Real Account, NDC has the managerial advantages: promote the escalation of social pooling level, inspire employees' enthusiasm for contributions and extension of payment periods to achieve delayed retirement, eliminate investment bottlenecks, and ease the financial pressure for current payment. Conclusion: (1) different models of individual accounts will not change the contributor's rights and interests. (2) From the perspective of security level, management, efficiency, and China's actual situation of individual accounts, the hybrid SP& IPA system based on NDC funding model is a rational choice suitable for China's pension reform.
机译:目的:从管理,效率,安全水平和其他方面的角度进行三种型号模型的比较分析。方法:MATLAB建模用于保险基金运作的实证定量分析三种不同的模型。结果:(1)在养老金,替换率和其他指标的总价值方面,NDC≈fdc>真实账户的安全级别; (2)就纵向内涵率,NDC> FDC>真实账户; (3)与实际账户相比,纳税人有管理优势:促进社会汇集水平的升级,激励员工的贡献和延长支付期的热情,以实现延迟退休,消除投资瓶颈,缓解当前的财务压力支付。结论:(1)不同型号的个别账户不会改变贡献者的权益。 (2)从安全级别,管理,效率和中国的个人账户的实际情况来看,基于NDC资助模式的混合SP和IPA系统是适合中国养老金改革的理性选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号