首页> 外文会议>Winter Marketing Academic Conference >To Renounce or Not to Renounce, That Is the Question: An Exploratory Sequential Scale Development Study of Consumers' Perceptions of Voluntary Deconsumption
【24h】

To Renounce or Not to Renounce, That Is the Question: An Exploratory Sequential Scale Development Study of Consumers' Perceptions of Voluntary Deconsumption

机译:放弃或不放弃,这是一个问题:消费者对自愿解密的看法的探索性顺序规模发展研究

获取原文

摘要

This exploratory sequential mixed methods study of scale development was conducted to render conceptual clarity to the concept of voluntary deconsumption, to explore decon-sumption behavior under the tenets of the attribution theory of motivation, and to examine the components, structures, uses, and measurement properties of the scale of voluntary deconsumption. It was an attempt at holistic understanding of deconsumption, and re-conceptualizing anticonsumption theory by delineating it from other similar research fields, i.e., sustainability, environmental, and ethical concerns in the social marketing literature. The critical incident in a relationship context (CIRC) technique (Edvardsson and Strand-vik, 2000) was used in conjunction with grounded theory approach in the qualitative phase (study 1); and survey research, principal components analysis, and Rasch analysis (Rasch, 1960) using Winsteps 3.92.1 (Linacre, 2016) were used in the quantitative phase (study 2). A behavioral process theory of the experience of voluntary deconsumption was posited; and motivations and consequences of voluntary deconsumption were discussed. The differences in the experience of voluntary deconsumption based on variables such as deconsumption type (voluntary and involuntary), gender (male and female), and baby boomer type (trailing- and leading-edge) were explained as well. Sub-scales of voluntary deconsumption included four compo- nents, i.e., elevated state of purpose, social agency and activism, nonmaterialism, and acceptance of life circum-stances. Finally, the unidimensionality, appropriate scale use, in variance, and levels of validity and reliability of these subscales of voluntary deconsumption were tested, and reported as acceptable and appropriate. In conclusion, the implications of the results for theory, research methodology, and practice were discussed, and recommendations for future research inquiry were made.
机译:这种探索性顺序混合方法的规模开发研究是对自愿解构的概念的概念清晰度,探讨了归因理论的宗旨,探讨了动机理论的欺诈行为,并检查了组件,结构,用途和测量自愿解密规模的性质。通过将其从其他类似研究领域描绘,即社会营销文献中的可持续性,环境和道德问题划定了划分​​的解除批准,并重新概念化反响应理论,这是一种全面的理解。在关系上下文(CIRC)技术(Edvardsson和Strand-Vik,2000)中的危急事件与定性阶段的接地理论方法结合使用(研究1);使用WinSteps 3.92.1(Linacre,2016)使用了使用WinSteps 3.92.1(Linacre,2016)的调查研究,主成分分析和Rasch,1960)(研究2)。假设自愿分类经验的行为过程理论;讨论了自愿解密的动机和后果。还解释了基于诸如解除卷积类型(自愿和非自愿),性别(男女和女性)和婴儿Boomer型(尾随和前缘)的变量自愿分类经验的差异。自愿分类的子尺度包括四个伴侣,即宗旨,社会代理和激进,非物质主义和终身态度的升高。最后,测试了单层,适当的尺度使用,方差和可靠性和可靠性水平和可靠性和可靠性的测试,并报告可接受和适当。总之,讨论了理论,研究方法和实践结果的影响,并制定了未来研究查询的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号