首页> 外文会议>Winter Marketing Academic Conference >Servitization and Organizational Performance: Is Organizational Learning Ambidexterity a Missing Link?
【24h】

Servitization and Organizational Performance: Is Organizational Learning Ambidexterity a Missing Link?

机译:伺服化和组织绩效:是组织学习的怀抱缺失链接吗?

获取原文

摘要

In order to secure their competitiveness, more and more manufacturing firms adopt the servitization approach. However, the existing literature on its impact reveals mixed results. For example, while Neely (2008) finds that manufacturing firms with higher service provision generate lower revenues, Kastalli and van Looy (2013) find that service sales enhance revenue. Moreover, other scholars identify a nonlinear relationship between servitization and firm value (Fang, Palmatier, and Steenkamp 2008), profits (Suarez, Cusumano, and Kahl 2013), and sales growth (Kohtamaki et al. 2013). These mixed findings suggest that research in this field should shift focus from asking "whether or not" to investigating "why and/or how" and "when and/or for whom" manufacturing firms implement servitization in order to achieve a sustained competitive advantage.
机译:为了确保他们的竞争力,越来越多的制造公司采用伺服化方法。然而,现有的文献对其影响的影响揭示了混合结果。例如,虽然NEELY(2008)发现,具有更高服务提供的制造公司生成较低的收入,KASTALLI和VAN LOOY(2013)发现服务销售增长收入。此外,其他学者确定伺服化和公司价值(Fang,Palmatier和Steenkamp 2008)之间的非线性关系,利润(Suarez,Cusumano和Kahl 2013)和销售增长(Kohtamaki等,2013)。这些混合调查结果表明,该领域的研究应从询问“无论是否”来调查“为什么和/或如何”和“何时和/以上”制造公司以实现持续竞争优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号