首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems >Factuality Classification Using Multi-facets Based on Elementary Discourse Units for News Articles
【24h】

Factuality Classification Using Multi-facets Based on Elementary Discourse Units for News Articles

机译:基于小型话语单位的新闻文章使用多面的事实分类

获取原文

摘要

Factuality classification is used for classifying information based on degrees of certainty. It has been actively used in different applications including information extraction, textual entailment, finding semantic uncertainty and certainty, or fact extraction. In this paper, we propose an approach to improve factuality classification by analyzing information in Elementary Discourse Units (EDUs) and their relations. We use news articles as our case study since it contains information that has various degrees of certainty or factuality values (i.e., information about certain events or uncertain information from factual and opinionated information). In this work, we use five sets of facets for factuality classification, which are (1) Epistemic Modality set, (2) Subjectivity Type set, (3) Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) set, (4) Semantic Implicative and Factive Patterns set and (5) Weasel Words set. Unlike previous works on factuality classification, we use multiple facets of EDU to examine certainty and unambiguity level of information. We performed experiments based on news articles in FactBank corpus. We evaluated our method by comparing with several state-of-the-art factuality classification techniques and the results clearly show that our method can improve accuracy in terms of precision, recall and Fl-measure as 94.1%, 93.9% and 93.9%, respectively.
机译:事实分类用于根据确定性进行分类信息。它已积极用于不同的应用程序,包括信息提取,文本意外,寻找语义不确定性和确定性,或事实提取。在本文中,我们提出了一种通过分析小学话语单位(E​​DU)及其关系的信息来改善事实分类。我们使用新闻文章作为我们的案例研究,因为它包含具有各种确定性或事实值的信息(即,有关某些事件或来自事实和自由信息的不确定信息的信息)。在这项工作中,我们使用五套面部进行事实分类,这是(1)认知方式集,(2)主观性类型集,(3)修辞结构理论(RST)集,(4)语义令人临床和辅助模式集和(5)Weasel Sets。与以前的事实分类不同,我们使用EDU的多个方面来检查信息的确定性和不曼比。我们在Factbank语料库中的新闻文章进行了实验。我们通过与若干最先进的事实分类技术进行比较来评估我们的方法,结果清楚地表明,我们的方法可以分别提高精度,召回和飞行测量值的准确性,分别为94.1%,93.9%和93.9% 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号