首页> 外文会议>Innovation and Analytics Conference and Exhibition >Justifying Scale Type for a Latent Variable: Formative or Reflective?
【24h】

Justifying Scale Type for a Latent Variable: Formative or Reflective?

机译:潜在变量的尺度类型是潜在的变量:形成性或反射性吗?

获取原文

摘要

The study attempted to explore the possibilities to create a procedure at the experimental level to double confirm whether manifest variables scale type is formative or reflective. Now, the criteria of making such a decision are heavily depended on researchers' judgment at the conceptual and operational level. The study created an experimental procedure that seems could double confirm the decisions from the conceptual and operational level judgments. The experimental procedure includes the following tests, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), Tolerance (TOL), Ridge Regression, Cronbach's alpha, Dillon-Goldstein's rho, and first and second eigenvalue. The procedure considers manifest variables' both multicollinearity and consistency. As the result, the procedure received the same judgment with the carefully established decision making at the concept and operational level.
机译:该研究试图探讨在实验级别创建过程的可能性,以双重确认是否有表现变量比例类型是形成性的或反射性的。现在,制定这种决定的标准大量取决于研究人员在概念和业务层面的判断。该研究创造了一种实验程序,似乎可以双重证实概念和业务级别判断的决策。实验程序包括以下测试,方差膨胀因子(VIF),耐受性(Tol),Ridge回归,Cronbach的alpha,Dillon-goldstein的Rho,以及第一和第二特征值。该过程认为明显变量'都有多型性和一致性。结果,该程序在概念和运营层面仔细建立了相同的判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号