首页> 外文会议>Industrial Product-Service Systsems Conference >Change of culture or culture of change? Introducing a path-agency-culture (PAC) framework to sensitization research
【24h】

Change of culture or culture of change? Introducing a path-agency-culture (PAC) framework to sensitization research

机译:改变文化或改变文化?向敏感性研究介绍一条路径 - 代理文化(PAC)框架

获取原文

摘要

Right from the beginning of servitization research, one of the depicted organizational challenges of this transformational process resided in the realm of culture, especially concerning an organizational culture that is bound to a dominant product culture that prohibits the transformation to an integrated PSS provider. Therefore, the underlying concept of culture within current servitization studies promotes predominantly cultural consistence and coherence, possible variability's, ambiguities and paradoxes are to a greater extent omitted. Analysing and questioning the underlying concepts of culture within servitization research to this point, this paper will shed light on the question, how a comprehensive understanding of organizational culture can offer further insights to support the servitization process of companies. Two concepts of culture that are linked to path research serve as a theoretical foundation: The first concept identifies organizational culture as a promoter of path dependence and therefore as an inhibiting factor within the servitization process. The role of agents is perceived rather passive within this view. The second concept of organizational culture stresses the role of culture as a promoter of path creation and therefore as an enabling factor within the servitization process. According to this view, social agents can actively use cultural means to create new paths for the organization. On this basis a conceptual framework for analysing organizational culture within servitization will be introduced that comprises the dimensions a.) path constitution, b.) role of agents and c) manifestations of culture. This framework embraces the ambiguity of culture within the transformation process as both, an inhibiting factor, as a culture that needs to be changed, and as an enabling factor, as a culture of change.
机译:从培训研究开始,这一变革过程中的一个组织挑战之一居住在文化领域,特别是关于一个组织文化,这些文化涉及禁止转型给集成的PSS提供商的主导产品文化。因此,当前伺服化研究中的文化的潜在概念促进了文化的一致性和一致性,可能的变化,歧义和悖论在更大程度上省略。分析和质疑培养研究中文化的潜在概念,本文将阐明问题,如何全面了解组织文化可以提供进一步的见解,以支持公司的赠送过程。与路径研究相关的两个文化概念作为理论基础:第一个概念将组织文化识别为路径依赖的推动者,因此作为伺服化过程中的抑制因子。代理商在这种观点中被认为是被动的。组织文化的第二个概念强调了文化作为路径创作的推动者的作用,因此作为伺服化过程中的能力因素。根据这种观点,社会代理商可以积极使用文化手段来为组织创造新的路径。在此基础上,将引入分析伺服化内部组织文化的概念框架,其包括尺寸A.)路径宪法,b。)代理和c)培养表现的作用。该框架在转化过程中拥有培养的模糊性,抑制因子,作为需要改变的文化,作为一种能力因素,作为变革的文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号