首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Advanced Materials Development Performance >Comparison of two methods for testing the in-plane shear property of 3D stitched plain woven C/SiC composites
【24h】

Comparison of two methods for testing the in-plane shear property of 3D stitched plain woven C/SiC composites

机译:两种测量3D缝合仿纺织织式C / SIC复合材料平面剪切性能的比较

获取原文

摘要

Three types of three-dimensional stitched carbon fiber reinforced silicon carbide composites (3DS C/SiCs) with 4, 9 and 16 Z-yarn/cm~2 were fabricated by chemical vapor infiltration, respectively. Both iosipescu specimens without enough representative volume elements (RVEs) and ±45° tension specimens containing enough RVEs were tested to attain the in-plane shear properties of 3DS C/SiCs. The results showed that these two methods produced similar results. This demonstrated that the dimensions of iosipescu specimens were not necessary to cover enough RVEs for 3DS ceramic matrix composite in-plane shear testing. With respect to the shear modulus, both two methods would be regarded as the effective methods. However, in terms of the in-plane shear strength, iosipescu method would be a more reliable method.
机译:通过化学蒸汽渗透分别制备了三种三维缝合碳纤维增强碳化硅复合碳化硅复合材料(3ds C / SICS),由4,9和16 Z-γ/ cm〜2制成。没有足够代表体积元素(rves)和含有足够rves的±45°张力样品的Iosipescu标本均经过足够的r r v,以达到3ds C / SIC的面内剪切性能。结果表明,这两种方法产生了类似的结果。这证明了IOSIPESCU标本的尺寸是不需要足够的r伐用于3ds陶瓷基质复合面内剪切测试。关于剪切模量,两种方法都将被视为有效方法。然而,就面内剪切强度而言,iOSipescu方法将是一种更可靠的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号