首页> 外文会议>International Conerence on Applied Energy >Global zero emissions scenarios: assessment of climate change mitigations and their costs
【24h】

Global zero emissions scenarios: assessment of climate change mitigations and their costs

机译:全球零排放情景:对气候变化的评估及其成本

获取原文

摘要

This study investigated various zero emissions scenarios under AIT of IPCC-SRES (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Special Report of Emissions Scenarios) that allowed economic growth in particularly technological progress. We used our global modeling including a simplified climate model, whose supply costs of sectors in energies, materials, biomass and foods were minimized by linear programming from 2010 to 2150 in order to draw various zero emissions scenarios. In this study, we focused on various scenarios of CO2 zero emissions from the sectors and their climate change mitigations and their costs. Inclusion of Non CO2 greenhouse gases (NCGHG) can be chosen. We set following four scenarios. First one is Business As Usual (BAU) without any climate policy intervention. Second one is denoted as "350ppm zero", whose emissions trajectories are zero in the latter half of this century, which can be achieved by giving cumulative emissions of WRE 350 (Wigley Richels Edmonds) from 2010 to 2150 as emissions constraint. Caveating that this scenario add on the allowed WRE 350 emissions after 2010. Third one is denoted as "net zero", whose cumulative emissions from 2010 to 2150 is zero. This does not mean keep the emissions level zero in the time horizon; allowing positive emissions in several decades while negative emissions achieved by large deployment of BECCS (biomass energy carbon capture and storage). Fourth one is keeping the emissions level after 2100 is zero emissions, which is denoted as "2100 zero". We considered several patterns of carbon accounting for BECCS, such as carbon neutral, gross accounting, and net accounting. We also considered that two patterns of storage options for BECCS, one is only forest sink, the other one is allowing the captured CO2 into both the forest sink and geological storage. Following results when adding NCGHG emissions are obtained. Global mean temperature rise up to 2150 below 2 degree Celsius (DC) can be achieved in the "net zero" scenario, while "350ppm zero" scenario leached 2.3 DC. The "2010 zero" scenario leached 4 DC while BAU about 5 DC.
机译:本研究调查了国际集团IIT下的各种零排放情景(政府间气候变化小组 - 排放情景特别报告),可允许经济增长在特别技术进步。我们使用我们的全球建模,包括简化的气候模型,其能量,材料,生物量和食品的供应成本通过从2010年到2150的线性规划最小化,以绘制各种零排放场景。在这项研究中,我们专注于各部门的二氧化碳零排放的各种情况及其气候变化及其成本。可以选择包含非CO2温室气体(NCGHG)。我们设置了以下四个方案。第一个是常见(BAU)的业务,没有任何气候政策干预。第二个被称为“350ppm零”,其排放轨迹在本世纪下半叶的排放轨迹为零,这可以通过从2010年从2010年到2150到2150作为排放约束来实现WRE 350(Wigley Richels Edmonds)的累积排放来实现。在2010年之后,将这种情况加入允许的WRE 350排放量。第三个是表示为“净零”,其累积排放量为2010到2150为零。这并不意味着在时间范围内保持排放水平零;允许几十年的积极排放,而大规模部署BECS(生物质能量碳捕获和储存)而实现的负发射。第四个是在2100零排放后保持排放水平,其表示为“2100零”。我们考虑了几种碳核算模式,例如碳中性,总计,净核算。我们还认为,两个储存选项的两个模式为BECC,一个是森林水槽,另一个是允许捕获的二氧化碳进入森林水槽和地质储存。在获得添加NCGHG排放时的结果之后。在“净零”场景中,全局平均温度高达2150℃以下高达2150,而“350ppm零”情景浸出2.3 dc。 “2010零”情景浸出4个DC,而BAU约为5 DC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号