首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Social Responsibility in Mining >As Closure Approaches, Are You Preparing as Well as You Think You Are?
【24h】

As Closure Approaches, Are You Preparing as Well as You Think You Are?

机译:作为封闭方法,您是否准备以及您认为自己是呢?

获取原文

摘要

Characterization and assessment of waste rock has been the subject of considerable research, with the publication of a sizeable body of international guidance documents. Although detailed information exists for geochemical characterization of waste rock, there is limited detail on how to integrate these studies into engineering planning decisions around waste management options. A quantitative assessment is required to balance environmental management risks and operational cost constraints to facilitate planning decisions. Current industry practice, and the majority of guidance documentation, focuses solely on geochemical classification, without the subsequent connection to engineering planning. Hence, a disconnect exists between study outputs and operational requirements for placement method risk and cost assessment. A quantitative assessment methodology is required to determine risk/cost of various waste management approaches. This assessment must consider the complex interplay of factors influencing water quality at operations in long into closure. Only once these contributing factors to water quality are quantified can one appropriately understand, and quantify, risks associated with closure; in short, to properly plan for closure by achieving close alignment with mine planning and closure planning. O'Kane Consultants have developed an assessment process based around a quantitative risk tool to now allow the industry to accurately assess the risk/cost trade-off of waste management to water quality. Our assessment process captures multifaceted inputs, and employs an analytical model to provide quantitative analysis and outputs. Quantitative analysis and outputs allows risk to be assessed based on waste placement technique and facility engineering design; not solely material properties. Our approach allows assessment of progressive management measures against a deferral of all risks to final closure solutions, such as cover systems and/or mine effluent collection and treatment.
机译:废弃物的特征和评估是大量研究的主题,出版了一个相当大的国际指导文件。虽然废岩地球化学特征存在详细信息,但有限的详细信息如何将这些研究整合到废物管理方案周围的工程规划决策中。需要定量评估来平衡环境管理风险和业务费用限制,以促进规划决策。目前的行业实践,以及大多数指导文件,仅关注地球化学分类,没有随后的工程规划的联系。因此,在研究输出和放置方法风险和成本评估的操作要求之间存在断开连接。需要定量评估方法来确定各种废物管理方法的风险/成本。该评估必须考虑影响在长期运营中水质的复杂相互作用。只有在量化水质的贡献因素,可以适当地理解和量化与闭合相关的风险;简而言之,通过实现与矿山规划和封闭规划的近距离对齐来妥善计划。 O'Kane顾问已基于围绕定量风险工具开发了一项评估过程,现在允许该行业准确地评估废物管理风险/成本权衡对水质的风险/成本权衡。我们的评估过程捕获多方面的输入,采用分析模型来提供定量分析和输出。定量分析和输出允许基于废物放置技术和设施工程设计进行评估风险;不仅仅是材料特性。我们的方法允许评估对最终闭合解决方案的所有风险的推迟评估逐行管理措施,例如覆盖系统和/或矿井污水收集和治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号