首页> 外文会议>International conference on public-private partnerships >The Efficiency Claim of Public-Private Partnerships: A Look into Project Operations and Maintenance Costs
【24h】

The Efficiency Claim of Public-Private Partnerships: A Look into Project Operations and Maintenance Costs

机译:公私伙伴关系的效率索赔:调查项目运营和维护成本

获取原文

摘要

While the literature on public-private partnerships (PPPs) argues that the private sector's life-cycle approach to design and construction results in operational cost efficiencies, empirical support is missing. This study explored that issue conducting a four-prong investigation: First, a literature review searched for evidence of such efficiencies and methodologies to evaluate them: it found no empirical evidence of superior operations and maintenance (O&M) cost-efficiency in PPPs. Second, a simple methodology is proposed to evaluate life-cycle cost-efficiency, but adequate data and assumptions about O&M costs are needed. Third, since PPP projects in the United States are recent and currently subject to routine O&M, indicators to compare those costs were proposed. Fourth, a case study compared the routine O&M costs of a PPP to those of a system of traditionally delivered toll roads. The results showed that the PPP was more cost-efficient in operating expenditures (OPEX) per mile (-60%) and per lane-mile (-53%). The traditional system was more cost-efficient in OPEX per vehicle miles travelled (97%), toll transactions (332%), and toll revenue (20%). However, these three indicators depend on traffic volumes, which were overwhelmingly greater on the traditional system. While the case study showed cost-efficiency differences between public and private sectors, additional research is needed to empirically test the hypothesis of the private sector's higher efficiency. Understanding the differences in cost-efficiency between publicly and privately managed roads will help decision-makers to minimize the life-cycle cost of their investments.
机译:虽然关于公私合作伙伴关系的文献(PPP)辩称,私营部门的设计和施工方法导致运营成本效率,缺失实证支持。本研究探讨了开展四叉调查的问题:首先,检讨了评估它们的效率和方法的证据:它发现没有对PPP的优越操作和维护(O&M)成本效率的经验证据。其次,提出了一种简单的方法来评估生命周期的成本效率,但需要足够的数据和关于O&M成本的数据和假设。第三,由于美国的PPP项目是最近的,目前经常常规的O&M,提出了比较这些费用的指标。第四,案例研究将PPP的常规O&M成本与传统交付的收费道路的系统相比。结果表明,PPP在每英里的操作支出(OPEX)中更具成本效益(-60%)和每车道英里(-53%)。传统系统在每辆车数英里(97%),收费交易(332%)和收费(20%)中更具成本效益。但是,这三个指标依赖于交通量,这在传统系统上压倒了。虽然案例研究表明公共和私营部门之间的成本效益差异,但需要额外的研究来凭经验测试私营部门更高效率的假设。了解公开和私人管理道路之间的成本效率的差异将有助于决策者尽量减少其投资的生命周期成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号