首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering >Technology as moral proxy: Autonomy and paternalism by design
【24h】

Technology as moral proxy: Autonomy and paternalism by design

机译:技术成为道德代理:设计的自主和家长主义

获取原文

摘要

In this paper I argue that in cases where technologies provide material answers to moral questions that arise in the use context, they can and should be characterized as moral proxies acting on behalf of a person. Because of this we can accurately characterize the moral link between designers, artefacts and users as a relationship of a particularly moral kind. Moral proxies of the human kind have been a topic of analysis for some time in healthcare and bioethics, making them a good starting point for thinking about moral proxies of the artefactual kind. I draw from bioethics and STS literatures to build an analogy between human moral proxies in healthcare and artefactual moral proxies. I then turn my attention to design ethics considerations. If we accept that artefacts can function as moral proxies it becomes important to recognize that designers can subject users to paternalistic relationships that are ethically problematic. I demonstrate how we can use a proxy analysis as a tool for evaluating technologies. I argue that there are situations in which engineers should use proxy analysis to avoid paternalism by design while simultaneously improving user autonomy.
机译:在本文中,我争辩说,在技术为在使用背景下出现的道德问题提供材料的情况下,他们可以并且应该被称为代表一个人的道德代理。因此,我们可以准确地表征设计师,人工制品和用户之间的道德联系,作为特别道德的关系。人类的道德代理是医疗保健和生物伦理的一段时间的分析话题,使他们成为思考人工造工的道德代理的良好起点。我从生物伦理和圣路易斯文献中汲取,以建立医疗保健和手工业代理人的人道道德代理之间的类比。然后我注意了设计道德考虑因素。如果我们接受人工制品可以作为道德代理的作用,重要的是要认识到设计人员可以将用户理解为具有道德问题的家长式关系。我展示了如何使用代理分析作为评估技术的工具。我认为有些情况,工程师应该使用代理分析来避免通过设计的家长主义,同时提高用户自主。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号