首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.
【24h】

Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.

机译:医患关系中的家长式,患者自治和道德审议。挪威医生之间的态度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sixteen statements on physician attitudes in the physician-patient relationship were presented to a representative sample of Norwegian physicians (N=990). Three moderately correlated theoretical dimensions were identified in a principal component analysis: paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation. The paternalism scores increased significantly with age, and psychiatrists scored significantly lower than physicians in somatic specialties. Psychiatrists had the highest scores on the patient autonomy dimension, whereas surgeons scored the lowest. Moral deliberation scores increased slightly with age. To explore the pattern of scores across the three dimensions, the scores were dichotomized and combined in eight different ways. The resulting typology included five different physician profiles: (1) classical paternalists (high scores on paternalism, low scores on both patient autonomy and moral deliberation), (2) modern paternalists (high scores on both paternalism and deliberation, low scores on patient autonomy), (3) autonomists ( high scores on patient autonomy, low scores on both paternalism and deliberation), (4) deliberationists (high scores on deliberation and patient autonomy, low scores on paternalism), and (5) ambivalents (high or low scores on all dimensions, or high or low scores on both paternalism and patient autonomy). The four groups of physicians with 'consistent' attitudes contained between 12 and 19% of the total sample, whereas 37% belonged to the 'ambivalent' group. Laboratory doctors and surgeons belonged significantly more often in the group of classical paternalists than did general practitioners, whereas male physicians were more often modern paternalists than were female physicians. Among the autonomists, women were more numerous than men, doctors in their 40s clearly more numerous than those in their 60s, and psychiatrists clearly more numerous than residents.
机译:关于医患关系中医师态度的十六种陈述被提交给挪威医师的代表性样本(N = 990)。在主成分分析中确定了三个中等相关的理论维度:家长式,患者自治和道德审议。家长式的得分随着年龄的增长而显着增加,而精神科医生的得分显着低于躯体专业的医生。精神科医生在患者自主性方面得分最高,而外科医生得分最低。道德商议分数随年龄增长而略有增加。为了探究三个维度上分数的模式,将分数二分并以八种不同方式组合。由此产生的类型包括五种不同的医师概况:(1)古典的家长主义者(家长式的得分高,患者的自主权和道德审议的得分低),(2)现代家长式主义者(在家长式和慎重的态度上得分高,患者自治的得分低),(3)自主主义者(患者自主权得分高,家长式和审议性得分低),(4)谨慎主义者(在协商和患者自主性上得分高,家长式得分低)和(5)矛盾之处(高或低各个方面的得分,或者家长式和患者自主性的得分都高或低)。态度“一致”的四组医生占样本总数的12%至19%,而“矛盾”组占37%。与全科医生相比,实验室医生和外科医生在古典家长制中的比例明显更高,而男性医师则是现代家长制,而不是女性医师。在自治人士中,女性人数比男性多,40多岁的医生人数明显多于60多岁,精神科医生的人数明显多于居民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号