首页> 外文会议>Four Decades of Progress in Monitoring and Modeling of Processes in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System: Applications and Challenges >Modeling soil water movement under low head ponding and gravity infiltration using data determined with different methods
【24h】

Modeling soil water movement under low head ponding and gravity infiltration using data determined with different methods

机译:用不同方法测定的数据在低头探测和重力渗透下建模土壤水运动

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this work is to analyze differences in experimental and calculated model study of the processes of movement of soil water under low head ponding and gravity infiltration. In the forecast of the water regime two kinds of hydrological information were used - experimental and pedotransfer functions (PTFs). The experimental information: the hydraulic conductivities (HC) in saturated conditions were determined in the field conditions, unsaturated conductivity function was calculated (van Genuchten-Mualem model) using HC and water retention curves (WRC) , WRC were investigated in laboratory condition with the help of capillarimeters, sand-kaolin boxes and by the centrifuge method. PTFs included: regional PTF, based on the data of the original database for the soil hydrological properties of the study area relying on the soil density and soil organic content, PTF based on particle size distribution, based on field capacity and wilting point as a predictors, and PTFs based on physico-mechanical properties, specifically Atterberg limits. The spatial distribution of moisture indicates that after infiltration under low head ponding, the soil water content variation is rather high (at depths of 50 and 60 cm the quartiles were about 2-3 and 6-12%), but in the case of gravity infiltration the quartiles were about 2 and 5% . This points to the presence of preferential flows. The best forecast of the real-mode soil water regime gave experimental hydrological information: no systematic errors in the high min-max range of modeling errors. Among PTFs the modeling results were placed in the following order: regional PTFs work better (>) than PTFs based on the field capacity and wilting point >PTFs based on Atterberg limits> PTF based on particle size distribution . The statistical analysis of the modeling errors by Williams-Klute nonparametric statistical criteria is evidence that models describe best gravity filtration.
机译:这项工作的目的是分析低头探测和重力渗透下土壤水运动过程的实验和计算模型研究的差异。在水政权预测中,使用了两种水文信息 - 实验和PetoT转移功能(PTF)。实验信息:在现场条件下测定饱和条件下的液压导电性(HC),使用HC和水保留曲线(WRC)计算不饱和电导功能(VAN Genuchten-Mualem Model),在实验室条件下调查WRC毛细管仪,砂高岭土盒和离心机方法的帮助。 PTFS包括:区域PTF,基于原始数据库的数据,用于研究区域的土壤水文特性依赖于土壤密度和土壤有机含量,PTF基于粒度分布,基于现场容量和衰落点作为预测因素和PTFS基于物理机械性能,特别是Atterberg限制。水分的空间分布表明,在低头换热下浸润后,土壤水含量变化相当高(在50和60cm的深度,四分位数约为2-3和6-12%),但在重力的情况下渗透四分位数约为2和5%。这指出了优惠流动的存在。实模式土壤水规的最佳预测给出了实验水文信息:在建模误差的高分最大值范围内没有系统误差。在PTF中,建模结果按以下顺序放置:区域PTFS基于基于粒度分布的ATTerberg限制> PTF的现场容量和WILting点> PTF而优于PTF。 Williams-Klute非参数统计标准对建模误差的统计分析是模型描述最佳重力过滤的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号