首页> 外文会议>R and D Management Conference >Standing in Misunderstanding: Analyzing Boundary Objects' Effectiveness in Innovation Communities
【24h】

Standing in Misunderstanding: Analyzing Boundary Objects' Effectiveness in Innovation Communities

机译:站立误解:分析创新社区的边界对象的效果

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we investigate objects that span boundaries to foster mutual understanding in virtual innovation communities. In particular, we study virtual whiteboards (which comprise a mix of boundary objects) in the early phases of the innovation process. Information systems provide new boundary objects for community members which support their non-canonical, collaborative work required for igniting new ideas (Brown & Duguid, 1991a; Wenger, 1998). Our study follows the two-sided perspective of socio-technical systems theory (Bostrom&Heinen, 1977). From a social perspective, extant literature provides coverage of the roles of boundary objects for collaborative innovation (Carlile, 2002; Tushman, 1977). From a technical perspective, research investigates efficient communication through media, predicting that most efficient communication is achieved when the object's synchronicity fits the communication requirements (Dennis, Fuller, & Valacich, 2008). First, we assume that boundary objects which convey information most effectively perform high in the idea generation phase. Second, we assume boundary objects that converge on meaning most effectively to perform high in the development and evaluation of ideas. Our empirical analysis takes the form of multiple case study analysis (Yin, 2009) of (virtual) innovation communities. Data has been collected from users of a virtual whiteboard who participated in collaborative innovation. The data comprises of information on the use of boundary objects in workshops with members of the innovation community. We conclude with managerial and practical recommendations on how to design boundary objects for (virtual) innovation communities to overcome communications boundaries.
机译:在本文中,我们调查跨越界限,以促进虚拟创新社区中的相互理解的对象。特别是,我们在创新过程的早期阶段中研究虚拟白板(其包括边界对象的混合)。信息系统为社区成员提供新的边界对象,这些人支持出点燃新想法所需的非规范,协作工作(Brown&Duguid,1991a; Wenger,1998)。我们的研究遵循社会技术系统理论的双面视​​角(Bostrom&Heinen,1977)。从社会角度来看,现有文献提供了边界对象的作用,以便合作创新(Carlile,2002; Tushman,1977)。从技术角度来看,研究通过媒体调查有效的沟通,预测当象的同步性适合通信要求时实现了最有效的沟通(Dennis,Fuler,&Valacich,2008)。首先,我们假设传送最有效地在思想生成阶段中执行高度的边界对象。其次,我们假设界限对象融合最有效的意义,以便在思想的开发和评估中表现高。我们的实证分析采用了多种案例研究分析(YIN,2009)的(虚拟)创新社区的形式。已经从参与协作创新的虚拟白板的用户收集数据。数据包括关于使用创新社区成员的研讨会中的边界对象的信息。我们与关于如何设计(虚拟)创新社区的边界对象来克服通信界限的管理和实际建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号