首页> 外文会议>CIE Conference on "Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency" >VISIBILITY EVALUATION FOR FACE OF PERSON STANDING UNDER LED STREET LIGHTING ENVIRONMENT
【24h】

VISIBILITY EVALUATION FOR FACE OF PERSON STANDING UNDER LED STREET LIGHTING ENVIRONMENT

机译:面对LED街道照明环境下的人面对面的可见性评估

获取原文

摘要

In this research, we performed the field experiments during night to determine the effect of LED street lighting on pedestrian visibility. A total of five different LED sources were used: three different luminous flux levels and two different types of mounted diffusion filters. We also added two other types of lights for comparison: fluorescent light and HID mercury vapour lamp. We used human faces as the objects of visibility evaluations. The first finding of our research was that a 1,000 lm LED light and a 2,000 lm LED light with an 80° diffusion plate provided low illumination of the object surface, and had lower evaluation values than did the other lights. Our second finding was that the evaluation values for 2,000 lm LED light; 3,000 lm LED light; and 2,000 lm LED light with 20° diffusion plate were higher than the first two LED lamps and about the same as that of fluorescent lamp. Our third finding was that HID mercury vapour lamps had the highest evaluation among any lighting type employed in the experiment.
机译:在这项研究中,我们在夜间进行了现场实验,以确定LED路灯对行人可见性的影响。使用共有五种不同的LED源:三种不同的光通量水平和两种不同类型的安装扩散过滤器。我们还添加了另外两种类型的灯,用于比较:荧光灯和HID汞蒸汽灯。我们将人称作为可见性评估的对象。首先发现我们的研究是,1,000 LM LED灯和2,000 LM LED灯,带有80°扩散板的物体表面的照明,并且具有比其他灯更低的评估值。我们的第二个发现是,评估值为2,000升LED灯; 3000 LM LED灯;和20°扩散板的2,000 LM LED灯高于前两个LED灯,与荧光灯大致相同。我们的第三个发现是HID汞蒸汽灯在实验中使用的任何照明型之间的评估都有最高的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号