首页> 外文会议>SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference >What Actually Controls SRV? Three Concepts to Debate a Stimulation or Stimulate a Debate!
【24h】

What Actually Controls SRV? Three Concepts to Debate a Stimulation or Stimulate a Debate!

机译:实际控制SRV是什么?三个概念争论刺激或刺激辩论!

获取原文

摘要

It is generally believed that creating a Stimulated Rock Volume (SRV) is a good thing. Completion engineers talk about creating complexity, geologists talk about stimulating a natural fracture network, geomechanicists highlight the importance of low stress anisotropy. But how much do these concepts matter and can we actually do anything about them, or do we get what we're given? A review of producing formations from plays across North America shows that there are three primary types of sub-surface heterogeneity at the length-scale of a well-bore that should be considered together as controls on SRV: natural fractures, bedding (layering) anisotropy and stress changes. Typically bedding and stress variability are over-looked as SRV controls. The impact of each form of heterogeneity on SRV depends more on the magnitude of the change rather than the existence of the heterogeneity within the rock. Natural fractures may contribute to a SRV where there is a geometrically-connected network in the presence of low horizontal stress anisotropy, however the contribution would be mostly unpropped conductivity. A low horizontal stress anisotropy alone, without natural fractures, is not likely to enhance a SRV because the most stress-anisotropic lithology may not be the optimal landing zone for a lateral. Bedding anisotropy (e.g. fine-scale layering, or laminations) and vertical stress changes can be the source of fracture initiation and propagation problems, and may cause an 'apparent SRV' in some plays, when treating pressure is close to, but not necessarily exceeding overburden. After a critical assessment of each control, in the form of a debate, it is concluded that if a rock has the potential for a SRV to be generated, as indicated from microseismic, then; a) not every type of complexity necessarily creates value, b) it is difficult to optimize the conductivity within an SRV, and c) it is possible to severely limit the SRV potential of a rock by not accounting for the three main sub-surface controls, together.
机译:通常认为,产生刺激的岩石体积(SRV)是件好事。完成工程师谈论创造复杂性,地质学家谈论刺激自然骨折网络,地质力学家突出了低应力各向异性的重要性。但这些概念有多重要,我们实际上可以对他们做任何事情,还是我们得到我们所赐的东西?从北美的戏剧中产生形成的综述表明,在孔的长度范围内有三种主要类型的亚表面异质性,其应在SRV上的控制:自然骨折,床上用品(层状)各向异性和压力变化。通常,床上用品和应力变化被过度看起来被视为SRV控制。每种形式的异质性对SRV的影响更多地取决于变化的大小而不是岩石内的异质性。自然骨折可能有助于SRV,其中在低水平应力各向异性存在下存在几何连接网络,但是贡献将主要是未分散的电导率。单独的低水平应力各向异性,没有自然骨折,不太可能增强SRV,因为最应力 - 各向异性岩性可能不是侧向的最佳着陆区。床上用品各向异性(例如细尺寸分层或叠片)和垂直应力变化可以是骨折启动和传播问题的源,并且当处理压力接近但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过但不一定超过覆盖物。在对每个控制的批判性评估之后,以辩论的形式得出结论,如果岩石具有待产生SRV的可能性,则如微震,那么; a)不是每种类型的复杂性必然会产生值,b)很难优化SRV内的电导率,而C)可以通过不占三个主要的子表面控制来严重限制岩石的SRV电位, 一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号