首页> 外文会议>European Conference on Information Warfare and Security >The Control of Technology by Nation State: Past, Present and Future: The Case of Cryptology and Information Security
【24h】

The Control of Technology by Nation State: Past, Present and Future: The Case of Cryptology and Information Security

机译:国家州的技术控制:过去,现在和未来:密码学和信息安全的情况

获取原文

摘要

Since the end of WWII, strong controls have been enforced to prevent the spread of military-grade technology or dual use technologies and, since the end of the seventies, especially of Information Security science. The rises of the Internet phenomenon as well as the rise of terrorism make this control even stronger yet more subtle. Contrary to the common belief, the freedom of technology and science is just an illusion. Recently the emerging hacker phenomenon has upset and thwarted this balance between the need of freedom and the need of State security requirements. The main issue lies in the fact that these controls originally focus on homeland and international security purposes (e.g. protection against terrorism or mafia activities). But the fall of the iron curtain and of the Soviet block has dramatically changed the rules of the game. The enforced controls aim at first organizing an economic dominance of a very few Nation States (e.g. G-8 countries) whose real intent is to organize the strategic dominance over the ever-growing technological societies. As an example (among many others), we could mention the case of Cisco vs Huawei/ZTE companies. Based on his own military experience and on his academic work, we are going to explain how this control has been and is organized and will explain the role of the four major actors: Nation State, Industry, Academics and Hackers. We will take the domain of cryptography and of network equipment as illustrating cases.
机译:自第二次世界大战结束以来,已经强制执行了强大的控制,以防止军事级技术或双重使用技术的传播,并自七十年代末,尤其是信息安全科学。互联网现象的上升以及恐怖主义的兴起使得这种控制变得更加微妙。与普遍的信念相反,技术自由和科学只是一种幻觉。最近,新兴黑客现象在自由的需求和国家安全要求的需要之间感到不安并挫败了这种平衡。主要问题在于,这些控制最初专注于国土和国际安全目的(例如,防止恐怖主义或黑手党活动)。但是铁幕和苏联块的堕落大大改变了比赛的规则。强制控制旨在首先组织一个非常少数国家(例如G-8国家)的经济主导地位,其真正的意图是组织以不断增长的技术社会来组织战略主导地位。作为一个例子(在许多其他人中),我们可以提及思科VS华为/中兴通讯公司的情况。基于他自己的军事经验和他的学术工作,我们将解释这种控制如何并被组织,并将解释这四个主要行动者的作用:国家,工业,学者和黑客。我们将占据密码域和网络设备作为说明案例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号