首页> 外文会议>Society of Core Analysts Symposium >LOW WATER PERMEABILITY MEASUREMENTS OF CLAY SAMPLE. CONTRIBUTION OF STEADY STATE METHOD COMPARED TO TRANSIENT METHODS
【24h】

LOW WATER PERMEABILITY MEASUREMENTS OF CLAY SAMPLE. CONTRIBUTION OF STEADY STATE METHOD COMPARED TO TRANSIENT METHODS

机译:粘土样品的低水渗透率测量。与瞬态方法相比稳态方法的贡献

获取原文

摘要

Very low permeability geomaterials (order of nanoDarcy (10-21 m~2)), such as clays rocks, are studied for many industrial applications such as production from unconventional reserves of oil and gas, CO2 geological storage and deep geological disposal of high-level long-lived nuclear wastes. For these last two applications, clay efficiency as barrier relies mainly on their very low permeability. Laboratory measurement of low permeability to water (below 100nD (10-19 m~2)) remains a technical challenge. Some authors [1] argue that steady state methods are irrelevant due to the time required to stabilize water fluxes in such low permeability media. Most of the authors (e.g. [2]) measuring low permeabilities use a transient technique called pulse decay. This study aims to compare objectively these different types of permeability tests performed on a single clay sample. For the steady state method, a high precision pump was used to impose a pressure gradient and to measure the small resulting water flow rate at steady state. We show that with a suitable set-up, the steady state method enables to measure a very low permeability of 0.8 nD (8 10-22 m~2) in a period of three days. For a comparable duration, the pulse decay test, most commonly used for such low permeability measurements, provides only an average estimate of the permeability. Permeability measurements by pulse decay require to perform simulations to interpret the pressure relaxation signals. Many uncertainties remain such as the determination of the reservoirs storage factor, micro leakage effect, or the determination of the initial pulse pressure. All these uncertainties have a very significant impact on the determination of sample permeability and specific storage.
机译:非常低的渗透性地质材料(纳米甘蓝(10-21 m〜2)的顺序),如粘土岩,用于许多工业应用,如生产的石油和天然气的非传统储量,CO2地质储量和高地质处理水平长期核垃圾。对于这些最后两种应用,粘土效率主要依赖于它们非常低的渗透性。对水的低渗透性的实验室测量(低于100nd(10-19 m〜2)仍然是技术挑战。一些作者[1]认为,由于稳定​​在这种低渗透性介质中的水通量所需的时间,稳态方法是无关的。大多数作者(例如[2])测量低渗透性使用称为脉冲衰减的瞬态技术。本研究旨在客观地比较这些不同类型的渗透性测试在单个粘土样品上进行。对于稳态方法,使用高精度泵施加压力梯度并测量稳态处的小结果水流速。我们表明,通过合适的设置,稳态方法可以在三天内测量0.8 nd(8 10-22 m〜2)的非常低的渗透率。对于可比持续时间,脉冲衰减测试最常用于这种低渗透率测量,仅提供了渗透性的平均估计。通过脉冲衰减的渗透率测量要求执行模拟以解释压力松弛信号。许多不确定性仍然存在,例如确定储存因子,微泄漏效果或初始脉冲压力的确定。所有这些不确定性都对测定样品渗透性和特异性储存产生非常显着的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号