首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress and Exhibition >Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Drive Cycle Emissions and Fuel Economy Estimations Using Vehicle Systems Simulations with E30 and ULSD
【24h】

Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Drive Cycle Emissions and Fuel Economy Estimations Using Vehicle Systems Simulations with E30 and ULSD

机译:反应性控制压缩点火驱动循环排放和燃料经济性估计,使用e30和ulsd使用车辆系统模拟

获取原文

摘要

In-cylinder blending of gasoline and diesel to achieve reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) has been shown to reduce NO_x and PM emissions while maintaining or improving brake thermal efficiency as compared to conventional diesel combustion (CDC). The RCCI concept has an advantage over many advanced combustion strategies in that the fuel reactivity can be tailored to the engine speed and load allowing stable low-temperature combustion to be extended over more of the light-duty drive cycle load range. However, the current range of the experimental RCCI engine map investigated here does not allow for RCCI operation over the entirety of some drive cycles and may require a multi-mode strategy where the engine switches from RCCI to CDC when speed and load fall outside of the RCCI range. The potential for RCCI to reduce drive cycle fuel economy and emissions is explored here by simulating the fuel economy and emissions for a multi-mode RCCI-enabled vehicle operating over a variety of U.S. drive cycles using experimental engine maps for multi-mode RCCI with E30 and ULSD, CDC and a variety of 2009 port-fuel injected (PFI) gasoline engines ranging from 1.8L to 4.0L. Simulations are completed assuming a conventional mid-size passenger vehicle with an automatic transmission that is optimized for each engine. RCCI fuel economy simulation results are compared to the same vehicle powered by a representative 2009 PFI gasoline engine over multiple drive cycles and showing at least a 20% improvement in fuel economy over a PFI baseline. Engine-out drive cycle emissions are compared to CDC and observations regarding relative gasoline and diesel tank sizes needed for the various drive cycles are also summarized.
机译:已经显示出汽油和柴油的汽油和柴油的含量混合已经示出了与常规柴油燃烧(CDC)相比保持或提高制动热效率的NO_X和PM排放的汽油和柴油。 RCCI概念在许多先进的燃烧策略中具有优势,因为燃料反应性可以根据发动机速度和负载量身定制,允许稳定的低温燃烧延长更多的轻型驱动循环负载范围。然而,这里研究的实验RCCI发动机地图的当前范围不允许对整个驱动循环的RCCI操作,并且可能需要多模式策略,其中当速度和负载落在外部时,发动机从RCCI切换到CDC。 RCCI范围。通过模拟使用用于多模RCCI的多模RCCI的多样性驱动循环的多模RCCI的车辆运行的多模RCCI的车辆的燃料经济性和排放来探讨RCCI来减少驱动周期燃料经济性和排放的潜力。和ULSD,CDC和各种2009个端口燃料注射(PFI)汽油发动机的范围为1.8L至4.0L。假设传统的中型乘用车具有用于每个发动机的自动变速器的传统中型乘用车的模拟。 RCCI燃料经济性仿真结果与多个驱动循环在多个驱动循环中由代表2009 PFI汽油发动机提供动力的相同车辆,并在PFI基线上显示燃料经济性的至少20%。将发动机驱动循环排放与CDC进行比较,并且还总结了各种驱动循环所需的关于相对汽油和柴油罐尺寸的观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号