首页> 外文会议>US National Combustion Meeting >A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Combustion of Live vs. Dead Leaves
【24h】

A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Combustion of Live vs. Dead Leaves

机译:活与死叶燃烧的组合实验与理论研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The behavior of live fuels is clearly different from that of dead fuels in wildfire conditions. Fire spread is sustainable at higher fuel moisture contents in live fuels than in dead fuels, but the fundamental reasons for this difference are not understood. Studies have examined the ignition times, rates of fire spread, moistures of extinction, and the fuel temperature histories of both dead and live fuels in a variety of conditions. However, a study of the temperature distribution and mass history of single live and dead leaves of the same moisture content in a wildfire condition has not previously been performed. Live and dead manzanita leaves (Arctostaphylos glandulosa) were conditioned to roughly 30% moisture content (dry basis) and burned over a flat flame burner. A base case of manzanita leaves at 4% moisture content was also burned. Each leaf had its mass logged by a cantilever balance and its face temperature recorded by an infrared camera. The temperature distribution of each leaf was tracked from the start of preheating to burnout and was analyzed as a whole leaf and in sections. Live leaves had a strong temperature plateau indicative of evaporation although it occurred well above the normal boiling point of water. In contrast, the conditioned and unconditioned dead leaves showed little if any temperature plateau. Using the dry, dead set, the average temperature of each section was used as the temperature input for a devolatilization model to predict the mass release of the leaf over time. This was compared to the measured mass release, showing good agreement. A theory to describe water release in moist leaves was developed to account for the difference in temperature distributions and histories of the dead and live leaves, especially with regards to the temperature plateau observed for live leaves. While the liquid in a dead leaf quickly diffuses out of a leaf as it locally reaches its boiling point, plant cells have been documented to hold pressures of between 30 atm and 100 atm (based on 50% bursting), depending on the species. These pressures correspond to water boiling temperatures of 235°C and 312°C which is similar to the temperature range of the live leaf temperature plateaus. This explanation was used to develop evaporation models which differentiate live and dead fuels and were coupled with a devolatilization model to predict a mass release curve which was compared to the measured history.
机译:活燃料的行为与野火条件中的死燃料的行为明显不同。火涂在活燃料中的较高燃料水分含量可持续,而不是死燃料,但不明白这种差异的根本原因。研究研究了点火时间,火灾率的速度,消灭水分以及各种条件下死亡和活燃料的燃料温度历史。然而,先前,尚未进行对野火条件中相同水分含量的单活和死叶的温度分布和质量历史的研究。将活和死亡的甘肃叶(Arctostaphylos Glandulosa)调节至大约30%的水分含量(干基),并在平坦的火焰燃烧器上燃烧。 Manzanita叶片的基础案例在4%的水分含量下也燃烧。每个叶子的质量通过悬臂平衡和红外相机记录的脸部温度。从预热到倦怠的开始,跟踪每片叶的温度分布,并被分析为整个叶片和部分。活叶具有强大的温度平台,表明蒸发虽然它高于正常水的沸点。相比之下,条件和无条件的死叶显示很少,如果任何温度高原都很少。使用干燥的死区,每个部分的平均温度用作脱挥发化模型的温度输入,以预测叶子的质量释放随时间。将其与测量的大众释放进行比较,显示出良好的一致性。制定了一种描述湿叶中水释放的理论,以考虑死亡和活叶的温度分布和历史的差异,特别是对于为活叶观察到的温度高原。虽然死叶中的液体快速地从叶子中延伸出来,但由于其沸点达到叶片,因此已经记录了植物细胞以阻碍30atm和100atm(基于50%爆破)的压力,这取决于物种。这些压力对应于235°C和312°C的水沸腾温度,类似于活叶温度平台的温度范围。这种说明用于开发蒸发模型,这些模型区分实时和死燃料,并与脱挥发化模型耦合以预测与测量历史相比的质量释放曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号