首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering and Technologynnovation >A Study on the Developmental Direction of Korean Green Building Assessment by Analyzing Comprehensive Scoring Methods
【24h】

A Study on the Developmental Direction of Korean Green Building Assessment by Analyzing Comprehensive Scoring Methods

机译:综合评分方法研究韩国绿色建筑评估发展方向研究

获取原文

摘要

In response to international concern about climate change and environmental degradation, the Korean government recently began developing the new concept of the Green Building Index (GBI), which represents the overall quality of green buildings. As the initial stage of the developmental process, this research contrastively analyzed two green building comprehensive assessment methods: the Weighted Total Comprehensive Method (GBCC method) and Relative Efficiency Comprehensive Method (CASBEE method), by reconstituting GBCC with the concept of CASBEE and performing calculations in order to understand the characteristics of these methods. The analysis results demonstrated that there were big differences between the two methods. Even though the two buildings received the same total, they are not the same with respect to environmental efficiency, because the ratios of environmental quality (Q) and environmental load (L) in the total gain score were different. Therefore, when setting the grading standard, the characteristics of different comprehensive methods should be considered in order to make GBI a more rational and agreeable representative index.
机译:为了应对国际对气候变化和环境退化的关注,韩国政府最近开始开发绿色建筑指数(GBI)的新概念,该概念代表了绿色建筑的整体素质。作为发育过程的初始阶段,本研究对比分析了两种绿色建筑综合评估方法:加权全综合方法(GBCC方法)和相对效率综合方法(Casbee方法),通过将GBC与Casbee的概念重构,执行计算为了理解这些方法的特征。分析结果表明,两种方法之间存在巨大差异。即使两座建筑物的总量接收到相同,它们与环境效率不一样,因为环境质量(Q)和环境负荷(L)的比率总数的比率不同。因此,在设定分级标准时,应考虑不同综合方法的特征,以使GBI更合理和令人愉快的代表性指数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号