首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on From Simplicity to Complexity in Chemistry and Beyond: Interplay Theory and Experiment >Chapter 2 Emergence, Breaking Symmetry and Neurophenomenology as Pillars of Chemical Tenets
【24h】

Chapter 2 Emergence, Breaking Symmetry and Neurophenomenology as Pillars of Chemical Tenets

机译:第2章出苗,破坏对称性和神经螺筋学作为化学原则的支柱

获取原文

摘要

Since Heraclitus and Parmenides human thought was based on the research of the first principles governing the world. This necessity requires the adoption of an invariance concept which in turn is described by laws and theories defined by symmetry properties. Chemistry does not follow this paradigm, because of its intrinsic interest in inducing a break in the order towards the emergence of a new order through a symmetry breaking process. Indeed chemistry is basically the study of matter and its transformations. The manipulation of the matter always requires the adoption of a realistic approach, which is strongly contrasting with the definition of an absolute truth. The minds of chemists are continuously addressing the verification of the potentialities of Nature and these potentialities are always referred to a reference context defined by other chemical compounds. When these properties are considered from another point of view, they lose a part of their significance. Therefore chemists adopt a divergent pragmatism, which is rather clear from the neurophenomenological approach they use in the interaction with quantum world. In fact the approach discards the study of the essence of the real things, since only the knowledge of the relationships between the things is necessary. In this sense the answer the chemists obtain from their investigation of the microscopic properties of matter must be always considered as the resultant of the interactions of the microscopic object with its environment. A few examples concerning the decay behavior of magnetic systems in metastable states are discussed.
机译:由于Heraclitus和Parmenides人类思想是基于对世界第一批原则的研究。这种必要性需要采用不变性的概念,这反过来由对称性属性定义的法律和理论描述。化学不遵循这种范式,因为它的内在兴趣在通过对称破坏过程中诱导新秩序的顺序诱导休息。实际上化学基本上是物质的研究及其转变。这种物质的操纵总是需要采用一种现实的方法,这与绝对真理的定义强烈对比。化学家的思想连续地解决自然潜力的验证,并且这些潜力总是称为由其他化合物定义的参考上下文。当从另一个角度考虑这些属性时,它们会失去其重要意义的一部分。因此,化学家采用了分歧的实用主义,这是从与量子世界的互动中使用的神经胶质素学方法来看。事实上,这种方法丢弃了对真实事物的本质的研究,因为只有必要的关系知识。在这个意义上,化学家从他们对物质的微观性质的研究中获得的答案必须总是被认为是显微镜对象与其环境的相互作用的所得到。讨论了关于亚稳态中磁性系统的衰减行为的几个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号