首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Public Management >Strengths and Weaknesses of Postmodern Legacy on Development Studies: a case study from an NGO in China
【24h】

Strengths and Weaknesses of Postmodern Legacy on Development Studies: a case study from an NGO in China

机译:后现代遗产遗产发展研究的优势与弱点 - 以中国非政府组织为例

获取原文

摘要

This paper tries to analyse the roots of post-development theories, first in modern theories and then, post-modern theories. It also provides an in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of post-development by an empirical example from an NGO in China. Post-development theory is a powerful tool to re-examine the questions of whose 'development' and whether it is relevant for the social majority. The grassroots initiatives and practice are also valuable raised by the post-development theory. However, practice is even more complicated, full of different actors, power relations and other factors. Post-development theory cannot replace all other development theories; otherwise, it will also become a hegemonic discourse itself. Also, development, as a term and practice, is still fluid and opens to the redefinition and the complete abandonment is not reasonable.
机译:本文试图分析开发后理论的根源,首先在现代理论中,后代理论。它还对中国非政府组织的经验示例进行了深入的分析,由中国的非政府组织的实证例子进行了深入的发展。开发后理论是重新审视其“发展”的问题的强大工具,以及是否与社会多数相关。基层举措和实践也是由开发后理论提出的有价值的。然而,练习更加复杂,充满了不同的行动者,权力关系和其他因素。开发后理论不能取代所有其他开发理论;否则,它也将成为霸权话语本身。此外,作为一个术语和实践,发展仍然是流体,并打开重新定义,完全放弃是不合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号