首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on the History of Machines and Mechanisms >At the Origins of the Concepts of Mathema and Mekhane: Aristotle's Mekhanika and Archimedes' Tropos Mekhanikos
【24h】

At the Origins of the Concepts of Mathema and Mekhane: Aristotle's Mekhanika and Archimedes' Tropos Mekhanikos

机译:在Mathema和Mekhane概念的起源:Aristotle的Mekhanika和Archimedes'Tropos Mekhanikos

获取原文

摘要

For Newton, modern science began its trend when it is connected to that tradition of thought of the Greek world, which had had its heart in the close rapport of mechanics, mathematics and philosophy, leaving that other tradition of thought of the Greek world, which had had his heart in the philosophical and epistemological concepts of substantial form and occult quality. We think it is true that both the mathematic thing, the mathema, and its model, the mekhane, have been blocked from using the epistemological concept of substantial form and occult quality of Platonic-Aristotelian tradition. In our study we want to investigate the internal aspects, the onto-epistemological ones, in our opinion little investigated by traditional historiography, attentive to external aspects of the concept. For this we compare two patterns of the two traditions: Aristotle's Mekhanika, in our opinion, instead, an eclectic written of Platonic-Aristotelian tradition, and Archimedes' tropos mekhanikos, in which the concepts of mathema and of mekhane with a clot of onto-epistemological concepts, developed from a tradition of thought with a strong philosophical, cognitive, not merely instrumental and utilitarian mark, come to sublime synthesis. Only inside a different conception of "theory", of "mathema" and of "mekhane" and only inside a different conception of philosophy that Pappus, in the passage cited of Newton, called "physiology of material elements", could develop what has been then the modern and fruitful conception of mathema and mekhane.
机译:对于牛顿,现代科学开始趋势,当它与希腊世界的思想传统相同时,它在机械师,数学和哲学的密切融洽关系中,留下了其他思想的思想,这他的心脏在哲学和认识论的大量形式和神秘的质量的概念中。我们认为,数学的事物,Mathema及其模型,梅肯,梅卡纳均被阻止使用大量形式和奔腾亚里士典的传统的重要形式的认识论。在我们的研究中,我们希望调查内部方面,即迎面的认识论,在我们看来,通过传统史学的研究,注意到概念的外部方面。为此,我们比较了两个传统的两种模式:亚里士多德的梅卡哈卡,在我们看来,相反,代替柏拉图尔语 - aristotelian传统,以及阿基米德的Tropos Mekhanikos,其中Mathema和梅卡纳的概念 - 认识论概念,从思想传统发展,具有强烈的哲学,认知,不仅仅是乐器和功利的标记,来升华综合。只有在“理论”的不同概念中,“Mathema”和“Mekhane”,只有在不同的哲学中的哲学,在帕帕斯在麦克风中引用的牛顿,称为“物质学元素的生理学”,可以发展是什么然后是Mathema和Mekhane的现代和富有成效的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号