首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building Materials >Analysis of Responsibilities Division of Quality Defect during Defects Notification Period under the Condition of 'Supply-only materials'
【24h】

Analysis of Responsibilities Division of Quality Defect during Defects Notification Period under the Condition of 'Supply-only materials'

机译:“仅限供应材料”条件下缺陷通知期内质量缺陷职责分析

获取原文

摘要

Defects Notification Period is the time in 99 FIDIC during which the contractor is responsible for quality warranty after receiving taking-over certification, and owner has the right to claim the quality defects caused by the contractor. This paper introduced concept of "the owner recommended supplier" and "Supply-only materials", pointing out that the fundamental difference between the two ways is contractual relationship. Through literature review to identify issues and responsibilities of the relationship the owner can claim during Defects Notification Period, the paper finally gave a basis on which the owners should take responsibility under the condition of "owner provided material", which provided reference basis for a similar controversy occurred in practice. Similar situations that contractor takes the owner recommends suppliers as Supply-only materials happen occasionally in practice. The situation that the owner recommends suppliers is entirely different from the situation that Supply-only materials in contractual relationship. In the former situation, there is not contractual relationship between the owner and the supplier. In the article, the author starts with conventions about the Defects Notification Period in FIDIC, analyzes claims matters in the Defects Notification Period and responsibilities of quality defects caused by disqualified materials when Supply-only materials based on analysis of laws and regulations about Supply-only materials and combined with actual cases in the hope of offering references to similar disputes in practice.
机译:缺陷通知期限是99个FIDIC的时间,其中承包商负责质量保证后接受过度认证后,所有者有权申请承包商造成的质量缺陷。本文介绍了“业主推荐供应商”的概念和“仅限供应材料”,指出两种方式之间的根本区别是合同关系。通过文献审查来确定业主在缺陷通知期内可以申请的关系和责任,该文件最终向业主应当在“所有者提供的材料”条件下负责,这为类似的参考依据提供了责任争议在实践中发生。承包商承担所有者建议供应商作为偶尔的供应商建议供应商的类似情况。业主建议供应商的情况完全不同于提供合同关系中的唯一供应材料的情况。在前面的情况下,业主和供应商之间没有合同关系。在本文中,提交人从关于缺陷的罪犯通知期的公约,分析索赔在缺陷通知期和由不信任材料造成的质量缺陷的责任时,在仅仅是关于供给的法律法规的分析时所提供的材料材料并结合实际案例,希望在实践中提供对类似争议的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号